Columbia Team News
 | |
 | Recruiting dilemma (Session 13) Posted by |
After a horrible season recruiting I have a difficult choice. We need a setter and need another player. Obviously our free 3* will be a setter but do I take a 1* libero (the cheapest) and hope for a good roll on the setter? If bad I can always try again next season.
Or do I risk an extra 460k on another 3* setter giving me a better chance of half decent rolls.
If I do go for two setters I guarantee they will roll similarly - that's just the way it is in this part of the game for me.
Readers Comments
I would also like to vote YES in the Columbia pays for a 3-star poll... 😎🤔👀
from personal expereince you do not want too many crap setters in your side!
Borokowski is a poor Setter with 2 7s and 2 8s in the main 4 skills. With a 33% chance for each of 7, 8 or 9 at SET I think I'm better off spending an extra 460k to make this 11% 7, 33% 8 and 55% 9
I would happily swap any of my D+ and worse setters for Borokowski next year. Suffice to say as Dave Dohm might put it we will be rbuilding for the next two years at least!
Here we go...the repeat PAC-8 conference champs are now "rebuilding"... 😎
Steve's seasonal 'rebuilding', 'will win nowt' posts remind me of a scene in a certain film....literally zero RP go to whoever quotes the film I refer to....
'How many are there?........THIRTY SIX?!?! But last year, last year I had thirty seven!!!'
Steve's equivalent post would read something like:
'How many (season wins/trophies) are there (for the Tomatoes)?........THIRTY SIX?!?! But last year, last year I had thirty seven!!!' (before realising he forgot to include his seasonal win(s) over the mighty Dallas because they're a given and easily forgotten)
I had no idea on the film so had to Google it but I've only seen the film once when it first came out.
Tough luck Steve, Good decisions don't always result in good outcomes! Still your OH freshman did ok with the dice rolls.
