Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 1

Why Do I Care?

Baton Rouge Bananas

Mike Halpin

(H)
at Merritt Island

Merritt Island Manatees

Mark Creasey

Baton Rouge leads series 20-4

Match Comments

home game to start with

Mark (Merritt Island) Dec 11 - 10:59 PM

high hopes!

Mark (Merritt Island) Dec 11 - 10:59 PM

lets be having you!

Mark (Merritt Island) Dec 11 - 11:05 PM

It'll be a great match (I hope)!

Mike (Baton Rouge) Dec 14 - 10:41 PM

The bananas have Merritt!

Phil (Carlsbad) Dec 15 - 4:58 PM

Mash those bananas!

Rob (Antioch) Dec 15 - 7:13 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Baton Rouge			Merritt Island
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
90.25	A	Libero		A-	86.50
84.13	B+	Middle Blockers		A	93.63
87.13	A-	Outside Hitters		B-	74.13
79.00	B	Right Side		C	67.75
79.25	B	Setter		B	78.75
		Skills Prediction

	24 MATCHES
20	WINS	4
12	HOME	2
7	AWAY	1
1	NEUTRAL	1

Baton Rouge		Merritt Island
#28	ELO Rank	#30

1,401.29	ELO Rating	1,348.38 (+145)

32.9%	ELO Winning Chance	67.1%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.331 25th	ATTACK PCT	.278 30th
12.73 18th	KILLS PER SET	11.88 30th
.868 9th	SERVE PCT	.847 30th
1.28 29th	ACES PER SET	1.13 31st
.543 21st	ASSIST PCT	.505 29th
12.4 16th	ASSISTS PER SET	11.6 29th
3.69 27th	BLOCKS PER SET	3.71 26th
6.04 30th	DIGS PER SET	6.37 23rd
.915 22nd	RECEIVE PCT	.916 20th
2.148 23rd	PASSER RATING	2.148 22nd

	TOP TWO
Catanzaro (OH) 289 Richter (OH) 249	KILLS	Murphy (OH) 241 Knoll (MB) 214
Catanzaro (OH) .554 Campos (MB) .462	ATTACK PCT	Knoll (MB) .588 Slaughter (MB) .448
Wilson (S) 926 Firpo (S) 461	ASSISTS	Greenslade (S) 868 Jakelski (S) 320
Staples (L) 20 Richter (OH) 20	ACES	Greenslade (S) 31 Mandella (L) 14
Campos (MB) 68 Catanzaro (OH) 63	BLOCKS	Knoll (MB) 64 Slaughter (MB) 60
Staples (L) 128 Williams (L) 117	DIGS	Van Wieren (L) 162 Mandella (L) 90
Staples (L) 2.32 Williams (L) 2.23	PASSER RTG	Troy (OH) 2.28 Van Wieren (L) 2.23

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
11.		Dominic Van Wieren Soph. B 2.23 Passer Rating 2.42 Digs Per Set	6.77

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	8	Apr 23, 2022	3	-	2	21-25	28-26	22-25	25-19	23-21	SEC	1	-	0
5	19	May 14, 2022	0	-	3	16-25	23-25	17-25			SEC Tournament5-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	2	-	0
5	34	Jun 11, 2022	0	-	3	21-25	20-25	16-25			SEC	3	-	0
5	45	Jun 25, 2022	0	- (n)	3	16-25	19-25	14-25			TMVL Cup	4	-	0
6	8	Aug 13, 2022	3	-	0	25-19	25-16	25-16			SEC	5	-	0
6	34	Oct 01, 2022	0	-	3	12-25	19-25	21-25			SEC	6	-	0
7	4	Nov 19, 2022	0	-	3	11-25	9-25	13-25			SEC	7	-	0
7	13	Dec 17, 2022	3	-	0	25-11	25-12	25-13			SEC	8	-	0
8	2	Feb 19, 2023	3	-	0	26-24	25-21	25-15			SEC	9	-	0
8	11	Mar 12, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	11-25	15-25			SEC	10	-	0
8	16	Mar 19, 2023	3	-	1	25-19	19-25	27-25	25-21		William G. Morgan Cup8-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	1
8	19	Mar 26, 2023	0	-	3	9-25	15-25	8-25			SEC Tournament8-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	11	-	1
9	1	May 29, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	16-25	20-25			SEC	11	-	2
9	10	Jun 18, 2023	2	-	3	23-25	25-20	20-25	25-22	14-16	SEC	12	-	2
10	14	Oct 08, 2023	3	-	1	21-25	25-19	25-17	25-21		SEC	13	-	2
10	19	Oct 15, 2023	0	-	3	20-25	13-25	12-25			SEC Tournament10-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	14	-	2
10	44	Nov 26, 2023	0	-	3	18-25	15-25	21-25			SEC	15	-	2
11	1	Dec 17, 2023	0	-	3	14-25	17-25	11-25			SEC	16	-	2
11	10	Jan 07, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	18-25	22-25			SEC	16	-	3
12	14	May 27, 2024	0	-	3	21-25	16-25	18-25			SEC	17	-	3
12	38	Jun 30, 2024	3	- (n)	1	25-22	15-25	25-22	26-24		Holyoke Invitational12-38Quarterfinals Holyoke Invitational	17	-	4
12	44	Jul 14, 2024	3	-	0	25-18	25-23	25-22			SEC	18	-	4
13	8	Sep 29, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	15-25	16-25			SEC	19	-	4
13	34	Nov 17, 2024	3	-	2	25-23	19-25	25-16	22-25	15-10	SEC	20	-	4
14	1	Dec 15, 2024	0	-	3	21-25	14-25	12-25			SEC	20	-	5
14	10	Jan 05, 2025	3	-	2	22-25	25-22	25-16	21-25	15-13	SEC	20	-	6

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.