Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

National Championship Sweet 16

Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Burlington Bullfrogs

Aires Martins Jr

(N)
Neutral Court

Quincy Rabid Biting Mules

Allan Sellers

Burlington leads series 11-8

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Burlington			Quincy
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
77.25	B-	Libero		C+	71.00
86.88	A-	Middle Blockers		A	90.75
79.88	B	Outside Hitters		A-	89.75
84.00	B+	Right Side		A+	96.00
77.00	B-	Setter		A	93.00
		Skills Prediction

	19 MATCHES
11	WINS	8
3	HOME	2
5	AWAY	0
3	NEUTRAL	6

Burlington		Quincy
#11	ELO Rank	#6

1,548.73	ELO Rating	1,602.53

42.3%	ELO Winning Chance	57.7%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.406 7th	ATTACK PCT	.436 2nd
13.73 1st	KILLS PER SET	13.67 2nd
.85 26th	SERVE PCT	.871 2nd
1.45 20th	ACES PER SET	1.72 10th
.594 5th	ASSIST PCT	.611 2nd
13.35 2nd	ASSISTS PER SET	13.46 1st
3.57 28th	BLOCKS PER SET	5.22 1st
6.48 22nd	DIGS PER SET	6.77 12th
.925 5th	RECEIVE PCT	.923 8th
2.179 9th	PASSER RATING	2.168 12th

	TOP TWO
Zuniga (OH) 240 Santos (MB) 199	KILLS	Woodruff (OH) 222 Balaso (RS) 209
Santos (MB) .647 Weigand (OH) .542	ATTACK PCT	Woodruff (OH) .579 Balaso (RS) .553
King (S) 765 Ramos (S) 359	ASSISTS	Esposito (S) 728 Deschamps (S) 272
Santos (MB) 22 Mallory (RS) 18	ACES	Shiba (MB) 28 Woodruff (OH) 23
Douglas (MB) 50 Santos (MB) 49	BLOCKS	Shiba (MB) 74 Balaso (RS) 48
van der Horst (L) 97 Weigand (OH) 63	DIGS	Woodruff (OH) 79 Balaso (RS) 75
Weigand (OH) 2.38 Neves (OH) 2.24	PASSER RTG	Woodruff (OH) 2.52 Stafford (OH) 2.24

#	TOP SETTERS	Rtg
8.	Corey King Senior B- 12.75 Assists Per Set 1.48 Service Pts Per Set	7.87
10.	Xavier Esposito Senior A- 12.55 Assists Per Set 1.59 Service Pts Per Set	7.60

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
2.		Wade Woodruff Junior A 3.83 Kills Per Set 2.52 Passer Rating	8.21

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
5.		Claudio Balaso Senior A 3.60 Kills Per Set 0.83 Blocks Per Set	8.04

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
5.		Kinichi Shiba Junior A- 1.21 Blocks Per Set 2.49 Kills Per Set	7.89

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	17	Sep 26, 2020	2	-	3	19-25	23-25	32-30	25-23	13-15	Non-Conference	1	-	0
1	31	Oct 17, 2020	0	- (n)	3	16-25	16-26	24-26			TMVL Grand Championship1-31Group Round TMVL Grand Championship	1	-	1
2	29	Mar 13, 2021	1	-	3	13-25	27-25	20-25	18-25		Non-Conference	2	-	1
3	29	Oct 09, 2021	1	-	3	19-25	20-25	25-23	19-25		Non-Conference	2	-	2
3	34	Oct 16, 2021	2	- (n)	3	25-23	25-21	17-25	24-26	12-15	National Championship3-34Quarterfinals National Championship	2	-	3
3	43	Oct 30, 2021	3	- (n)	2	19-25	30-32	25-22	25-21	15-10	TMVL Shield	3	-	3
4	29	Jan 15, 2022	3	-	2	15-25	26-24	25-18	20-25	15-8	Non-Conference	4	-	3
5	21	May 21, 2022	1	-	3	21-25	25-19	22-25	20-25		Non-Conference	4	-	4
6	42	Oct 08, 2022	0	- (n)	3	17-25	13-25	18-25			National Championship6-42SEMIFINALS National Championship	4	-	5
7	15	Dec 17, 2022	3	-	0	25-20	27-25	27-25			Non-Conference	5	-	5
8	31	Apr 16, 2023	1	- (n)	3	25-20	17-25	17-25	17-25		TMVL Shield8-31Sweet 16 TMVL Shield	6	-	5
9	15	Jun 25, 2023	3	-	1	25-23	25-21	16-25	25-18		Non-Conference	7	-	5
11	15	Jan 14, 2024	3	-	2	25-18	19-25	25-22	23-25	15-11	Non-Conference	8	-	5
11	45	Mar 03, 2024	3	- (n)	1	20-25	25-21	25-20	25-23		TMVL Cup	8	-	6
12	31	Jun 23, 2024	3	- (n)	0	25-19	25-19	25-23			TMVL Shield12-31Sweet 16 TMVL Shield	9	-	6
13	15	Oct 13, 2024	2	-	3	21-25	25-22	20-25	28-26	12-15	Non-Conference	10	-	6
13	46	Dec 01, 2024	1	- (n)	3	25-23	13-25	17-25	18-25		TMVL Shield	10	-	7
15	3	Jun 08, 2025	3	- (n)	1	25-19	25-15	21-25	25-22		William G. Morgan Cup15-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	8
17	15	Mar 08, 2026	3	-	2	24-26	25-22	23-25	27-25	15-10	Non-Conference	11	-	8
17	32	Apr 05, 2026									National Championship17-32Sweet 16 National Championship

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.