Players

Wade Woodruff Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	17	17	15	8

Season 17 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
375 4th	.614 11th	37 21st	110 33rd	59 83rd

Career Honors

S171st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 17)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	18	.333	8	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.26
3	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	11	.455	7	1	6	0.25	18	.667	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	5.45
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	19	.316	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	6.48
5	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	20	.450	2	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.24
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	25	.600	5	1	0	0.25	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.16
9	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	21	.667	8	0	3	0.00	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	10.00
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	19	.579	6	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	17.5	9.69
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	16	.438	6	2	0	0.67	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.64
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	3	20	.650	13	3	2	1.00	20	.900	.	.	.	.	20.0	10.00
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	14	.714	11	1	1	0.33	19	.947	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.90
18	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	1	25	.800	7	3	0	0.60	19	1.000	1	0.20	2	.500	26.0	9.12
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	1	21	.762	8	2	4	0.67	16	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	10.00
22	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	23	.565	10	2	0	0.50	20	1.000	.	.	.	.	23.0	9.65
23	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	3	26	.615	2	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.49
25	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	3	21	.571	11	3	2	1.00	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	9.99
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.22
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	1	20	.800	2	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.65
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	21	.619	8	1	1	0.33	18	.944	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.57
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	24	.625	8	2	2	0.50	18	.889	1	0.25	2	.500	22.0	9.30
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	26	6.50	2	33	.727	8	4	4	1.00	21	.810	1	0.25	2	.500	31.5	7.23
39	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	20	.700	6	3	3	0.60	19	.842	.	.	.	.	18.5	5.96
42	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	20	.650	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	2	0.67	2	1.000	14.5	7.46
44	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	3	26	.615	7	2	2	0.40	22	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	7.08
45	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	18	.722	5	1	3	0.33	13	.769	1	0.33	1	1.000	17.0	9.21
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	22	.545	5	0	3	0.00	21	.857	1	0.20	1	1.000	16.5	6.15
Total		93	375	4.03	59	515	.614	167	37	47	0.40	427	.890	9	0.10	17	.529	443.5	8.04

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 17)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	14	2.55	22	0	1.000	12.5	6.26
3	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	12	2.73	15	0	1.000	9.5	5.45
4	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	16	2.50	20	2	.900	11.0	6.48
5	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	8	2.27	15	0	1.000	14.5	6.24
7	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	17	2.54	24	0	1.000	20.0	9.16
9	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	16.5	10.00
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	5	2.56	9	0	1.000	17.5	9.69
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.43	14	0	1.000	12.0	6.64
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	20.0	10.00
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	5	2.25	12	0	1.000	14.5	8.90
18	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	8	1.60	21	2.67	27	0	1.000	26.0	9.12
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	7	2.33	5	2.57	7	0	1.000	22.0	10.00
22	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	2	4	6	0	1.50	6	1.50	10	2.64	14	0	1.000	23.0	9.65
23	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	14	2.21	24	1	.958	21.0	6.49
25	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	10	2.60	15	0	1.000	18.5	9.99
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.70	10	0	1.000	9.0	7.22
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.37	19	0	1.000	18.0	7.65
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	11	2.50	16	0	1.000	17.0	9.57
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	12	2.60	15	0	1.000	22.0	9.30
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	9	1.77	22	6	.727	31.5	7.23
39	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	13	2.17	24	3	.875	18.5	5.96
42	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	3	2.00	12	0	1.000	14.5	7.46
44	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	11	2.24	21	2	.905	21.0	7.08
45	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	6	2.50	8	0	1.000	17.0	9.21
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	8	2.16	19	1	.947	16.5	6.15
Total		93	4	55	59	2	0.63	110	1.18	255	2.41	412	15	.964	443.5	8.04