Players

Danny Murphy 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	14	13	9	-

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
173 122nd	.341 171st	43 7th	19 358th	62 76th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	13	.385	10	3	2	0.75	20	.900	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.65
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	7	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.56
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.58
5	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	13	.385	5	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.63
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	6	3	1	1.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.46
8	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	10	.200	13	4	1	0.80	26	.962	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.94
10	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	26	.308	8	3	2	0.60	22	.909	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.66
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	10	.100	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.53
13	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	12	.583	7	2	0	0.50	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.17
14	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	10	.400	4	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.50
17	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	19	.211	10	4	2	0.80	23	.913	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.98
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	16	.500	4	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.77
21	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	18	.056	8	3	2	1.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.95
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	5	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.70
25	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.29
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	12	.083	7	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.12
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	16	.063	4	4	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.25
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	15	.267	9	3	1	1.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.99
34	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	22	.318	3	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.43
36	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	12	.500	7	1	3	0.20	22	.864	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.72
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	7	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.63
41	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	19	.474	10	3	2	0.60	24	.917	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.63
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	9	.556	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.97
46	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	9	.667	8	1	0	0.25	20	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.19
Total		91	173	1.90	63	323	.341	150	43	33	0.47	396	.917	.	.	.	.	249.5	5.97

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	3	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.65
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.56
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.58
5	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.63
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.46
8	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.94
10	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	2	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.66
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.53
13	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.17
14	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.50
17	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.98
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.77
21	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.95
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.70
25	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.29
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.12
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.25
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.99
34	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.43
36	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.72
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.63
41	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	2	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.63
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.97
46	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.19
Total		91	5	57	62	17	0.68	19	0.21	.	.	.	.	.	249.5	5.97