Players

Edward Palmer 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	14	7	-

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
175 124th	.475 58th	9 247th	15 378th	72 46th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.82
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	1	0	2	0.00	5	.600	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.39
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.49
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	17	.176	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.01
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	9	.889	3	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.62
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	7	.571	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.21
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	17	.588	4	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.45
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.46
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	17	.353	9	1	3	0.20	20	.850	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.40
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	17	.529	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.59
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	7	.143	9	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.31
25	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.13
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	11	.545	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.46
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	12	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.98
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	13	.462	5	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.17
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	7	.714	4	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.48
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	14	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	11	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.67
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	8	18	.111	5	1	1	0.25	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.72
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	17	.647	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.78
Total		87	175	2.01	49	265	.475	62	9	22	0.10	166	.867	.	.	.	.	223.5	5.92

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.82
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.39
5	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.49
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.01
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.62
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.21
10	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.45
12	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.46
15	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.40
16	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.59
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
20	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.20
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.31
25	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.13
30	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.46
33	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.98
34	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.17
35	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	2	2	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.48
39	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
40	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.67
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	4	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.72
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.78
Total		87	7	65	72	11	0.83	15	0.17	.	.	.	.	.	223.5	5.92