Players

Edward Palmer 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	14	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.98
5	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	17	.176	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.08
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
8	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.13
12	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	12	.333	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.78
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.62
15	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	10	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.07
16	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	20	.600	5	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.58
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	14	.571	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.49
19	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	19	.211	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.75
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	12	.417	8	2	0	0.67	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.43
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	9	.667	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.38
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	14	.571	8	1	0	0.25	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.98
29	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	22	.455	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.38
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	11	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
34	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	12	.667	3	2	1	0.50	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.12
35	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	14	.357	9	1	3	0.20	17	.824	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.37
40	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	15	.067	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.28
45	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	13	.308	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.76
Total		82	166	2.02	54	279	.401	64	9	15	0.11	156	.904	.	.	.	.	215.0	5.98

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.65
3	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.98
5	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.08
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
8	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.68
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.13
12	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.78
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.62
15	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.07
16	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.58
17	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.49
19	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.75
21	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.43
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	2	2	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.38
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.98
29	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.38
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
34	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.12
35	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.37
40	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.28
45	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	2	3	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.76
Total		82	8	64	72	7	0.88	7	0.09	.	.	.	.	.	215.0	5.98