Players

Edward Palmer 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	15	14	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	10	2	0	0.67	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.11
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	13	.462	2	1	2	0.25	8	.750	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.28
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	12	.250	5	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.79
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	13	-.154	6	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.96
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	15	.133	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.79
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	12	-.167	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.61
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.87
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	12	.250	11	3	1	0.75	19	.947	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.49
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	13	.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	20	.150	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.78
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	15	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.89
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	13	-.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.79
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.14
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	16	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	16	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.41
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	16	.063	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.00
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.04
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	8	20	-.050	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.19
Total		72	104	1.44	62	250	.168	47	10	11	0.14	104	.894	.	.	.	.	154.5	5.35

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.11
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.28
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.79
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.96
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.79
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.61
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.87
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.49
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.78
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.89
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	7	7	2	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.79
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.14
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.41
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.00
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	9	9	0	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.04
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.19
Total		72	3	75	78	9	1.08	12	0.17	.	.	.	.	.	154.5	5.35