Players

Micah Russell 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
9	14	11	13	13	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	7	14	-.286	13	3	4	0.75	22	.818	0	0.00	2	.000	7.0	4.81
2	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	23	.435	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.17
4	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	18	.111	4	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.63
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	6	4	2	1.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.93
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	18	.000	10	3	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.46
8	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	22	.273	4	1	4	0.25	12	.667	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	5.25
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	15	.333	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.20	2	.500	8.5	3.31
11	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	24	.292	7	1	2	0.25	17	.882	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	6.84
13	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	16	.250	8	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.22
14	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.08
18	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	21	.190	8	2	3	0.40	21	.857	1	0.20	3	.333	14.0	3.92
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	15	.467	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.68
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.27
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	13	.154	11	2	4	0.67	16	.750	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.88
30	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	12	.333	2	0	5	0.00	12	.583	1	0.20	2	.500	7.0	3.31
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	15	.133	5	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.55
40	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	14	.143	7	0	6	0.00	16	.625	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.35
45	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	23	.174	9	1	1	0.20	18	.944	1	0.20	1	1.000	15.5	5.06
Total		69	143	2.07	69	299	.247	116	19	46	0.28	259	.822	6	0.09	12	.500	189.5	5.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	3	0.50	4	1.00	17	2.30	27	3	.889	7.0	4.81
2	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	16	2.24	29	2	.931	13.0	8.17
4	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	12	2.10	29	1	.966	7.0	3.63
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	14	2.50	24	0	1.000	14.5	7.93
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	4	1.33	8	2.00	19	1	.947	13.0	5.46
8	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	11	1.97	30	3	.900	15.0	5.25
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	4	0.80	24	2.20	46	4	.913	8.5	3.31
11	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	19	2.23	31	4	.871	14.0	6.84
13	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	17	2.44	25	1	.960	7.5	5.22
14	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.00	21	3	.857	6.0	3.08
18	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	10	1.96	27	3	.889	14.0	3.92
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	10	1.86	28	6	.786	11.5	5.68
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	6	2.56	9	0	1.000	9.5	7.27
29	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	6	2.15	13	0	1.000	10.0	5.88
30	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	22	2.20	40	2	.950	7.0	3.31
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	14	2.09	32	1	.969	8.0	3.55
40	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	13	2.26	23	1	.957	8.5	4.35
45	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	18	2.13	39	2	.949	15.5	5.06
Total		69	3	49	52	7	0.75	69	1.00	248	2.16	492	37	.925	189.5	5.15