Players

Carter Scott 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	11	8	10	10	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	14	.000	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	3.0	2.09
4	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	15	.200	3	1	2	0.33	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	4.46
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	20	-.050	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	2	0.67	2	1.000	7.5	4.62
8	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	10	21	-.190	4	1	2	0.25	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.00
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	20	.150	3	1	2	0.25	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	5.05
13	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	4	18	-.056	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	4.0	3.32
16	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	5	14	-.286	4	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.62
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	12	-.250	12	5	1	1.67	15	.933	2	0.67	2	1.000	8.5	6.14
20	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	9	18	-.222	11	2	4	0.50	19	.789	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	5.30
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	29	.103	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.32
24	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	19	.000	10	3	3	0.75	17	.824	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	4.00
25	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	21	.143	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	3.68
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	8	29	-.034	8	0	2	0.00	15	.867	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.65
32	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	9	20	-.200	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.75
36	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	19	.263	6	1	4	0.25	14	.714	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.20
Total		54	78	1.44	83	289	-.017	71	18	29	0.33	165	.824	9	0.17	12	.750	107.5	4.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	1.76	21	5	.762	3.0	2.09
4	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	8	2.67	8	2.26	19	0	1.000	6.5	4.46
5	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	9	3.00	7	2.07	14	1	.929	7.5	4.62
8	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	1.92	24	3	.875	7.0	3.00
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	11	2.00	26	2	.923	11.5	5.05
13	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	11	2.09	22	2	.909	4.0	3.32
16	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	4	1.67	15	1	.933	3.5	2.62
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	10	3.33	8	2.46	13	0	1.000	8.5	6.14
20	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	12	3.00	13	2.32	25	0	1.000	8.5	5.30
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	11	2.75	14	2.13	32	0	1.000	9.5	4.32
24	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	12	3.00	14	1.97	30	5	.833	9.5	4.00
25	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	8	1.91	23	2	.913	6.5	3.68
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	13	3.25	12	2.16	25	1	.960	7.5	4.65
32	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	14	1.88	34	4	.882	5.5	2.75
36	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	23	2.07	46	7	.848	9.0	4.20
Total		54	2	19	21	3	0.39	130	2.41	163	2.04	369	33	.911	107.5	4.01