Players

Match Info							Attack					Serve						Set
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	points	rating
2	C-1	H	San Jose	W	3-0	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6	1	3	0.33	11	.727	4	1.33	7	.571	1.0	8.81
3	T-WGM	N	Starkville	W	3-0	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	3.60
6	T-WGM	N	Manitowoc	W	3-1	4	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	11	3	4	0.75	20	.800	5	1.25	8	.625	3.0	4.58
9	T-WGM	N	Columbia	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	7.58
12	T-WGM	H	Baton Rouge	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	5.73
15	NC	A	New Orleans	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	3.95
17	NC	A	Pekin	L	2-3	5	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	7	1.40	12	.583	0.0	4.45
21	NC	H	Cincinnati	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	4.75
25	NC	H	Columbia	W	3-1	4	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	16	3	3	0.75	24	.875	4	1.00	5	.800	3.0	5.93
26	NC	A	Alton	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2	2	2	0.67	9	.778	1	0.33	4	.250	2.0	3.65
TOTALS						34	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	48	9	19	0.26	110	.827	33	0.97	70	.471	9.0	5.30

Match Info							Block					Dig		Receive
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	points	rating
2	C-1	H	San Jose	W	3-0	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	10	3.33	10	2.35	20	0	1.000	1.0	8.81
3	T-WGM	N	Starkville	W	3-0	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2	0.67	8	2.28	18	1	.944	0.0	3.60
6	T-WGM	N	Manitowoc	W	3-1	4	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5	1.25	10	2.00	25	2	.920	3.0	4.58
9	T-WGM	N	Columbia	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	11	3.67	8	2.06	16	3	.813	0.0	7.58
12	T-WGM	H	Baton Rouge	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	8	2.67	8	1.84	19	3	.842	0.0	5.73
15	NC	A	New Orleans	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	4	1.33	4	1.93	14	0	1.000	0.0	3.95
17	NC	A	Pekin	L	2-3	5	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6	1.20	19	2.00	39	5	.872	0.0	4.45
21	NC	H	Cincinnati	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	4	1.33	10	2.05	20	2	.900	0.0	4.75
25	NC	H	Columbia	W	3-1	4	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	8	2.00	12	2.00	30	2	.933	3.0	5.93
26	NC	A	Alton	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1	0.33	11	2.17	23	3	.870	2.0	3.65
TOTALS						34	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	59	1.74	100	2.06	224	21	.906	9.0	5.30