Players

Match Info							Attack					Serve						Set
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	points	rating
2	C-3	H	Quincy	W	3-0	3	2	0.67	2	5	.000	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	30	10.00	54	.556	3.0	5.93
3	T-WGM	N	Burlington	W	3-2	5	3	0.60	1	11	.182	11	2	2	0.40	24	.917	45	9.00	105	.429	7.5	6.15
4	C-3	H	Pekin	W	3-0	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	13	3	3	1.00	21	.857	35	11.67	60	.583	6.0	8.54
6	T-WGM	N	Nashville	L	2-3	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	4	0	4	0.00	17	.765	55	11.00	91	.604	1.0	4.72
8	C-3	H	Arlington	W	3-1	4	1	0.25	0	1	1.000	6	1	2	0.25	19	.895	62	15.50	104	.596	3.5	8.88
9	T-WGM	N	Albuquerque	W	3-0	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	7	0	3	0.00	15	.800	37	12.33	66	.561	1.5	8.46
11	C-3	A	Quincy	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	40	13.33	64	.625	0.0	6.74
12	T-WGM	H	Columbia	W	3-0	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	5	1	4	0.33	12	.667	37	12.33	63	.587	4.0	8.82
14	C-3	H	Portland	L	0-3	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	35	11.67	64	.547	2.0	6.40
15	NC	H	Manitowoc	W	3-0	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	10	3	3	1.00	18	.833	33	11.00	56	.589	8.5	6.70
18	NC	H	Schenectady	W	3-0	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	35	11.67	60	.583	7.0	7.82
19	T-3	A	Portland	L	0-3	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	6	3	1	1.00	15	.933	35	11.67	67	.522	5.0	6.66
21	NC	A	Antioch	W	3-2	5	4	0.80	1	10	.300	9	2	1	0.40	23	.957	57	11.40	101	.564	7.5	7.87
22	T-TC	N	Manitowoc	W	3-0	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	12	2	1	0.67	19	.947	39	13.00	72	.542	4.0	9.94
30	T-TC	N	Denali	L	1-3	4	4	1.00	0	4	1.000	6	1	2	0.25	18	.889	59	14.75	92	.641	5.5	8.68
32	T-NC	N	Burlington	W	3-2	5	2	0.40	2	4	.000	6	3	4	0.60	20	.800	62	12.40	93	.667	5.0	6.88
35	T-TC	N	San Diego	W	3-1	4	4	1.00	0	4	1.000	8	2	3	0.50	21	.857	58	14.50	89	.652	7.5	9.82
37	T-NC	N	Pekin	L	1-3	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	8	4	1	1.00	20	.950	51	12.75	87	.586	6.0	8.36
TOTALS						66	41	0.62	8	77	.429	123	27	41	0.41	306	.866	805	12.20	1388	.580	84.5	7.63

Match Info							Block					Dig		Receive
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	points	rating
2	C-3	H	Quincy	W	3-0	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	3.0	5.93
3	T-WGM	N	Burlington	W	3-2	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	6	1.20	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	7.5	6.15
4	C-3	H	Pekin	W	3-0	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6.0	8.54
6	T-WGM	N	Nashville	L	2-3	5	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5	1.00	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1.0	4.72
8	C-3	H	Arlington	W	3-1	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	3.5	8.88
9	T-WGM	N	Albuquerque	W	3-0	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1.5	8.46
11	C-3	A	Quincy	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.0	6.74
12	T-WGM	H	Columbia	W	3-0	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	4.0	8.82
14	C-3	H	Portland	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2	0.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2.0	6.40
15	NC	H	Manitowoc	W	3-0	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	8.5	6.70
18	NC	H	Schenectady	W	3-0	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	7.0	7.82
19	T-3	A	Portland	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1	0.33	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.0	6.66
21	NC	A	Antioch	W	3-2	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	9	1.80	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	7.5	7.87
22	T-TC	N	Manitowoc	W	3-0	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	4.0	9.94
30	T-TC	N	Denali	L	1-3	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.5	8.68
32	T-NC	N	Burlington	W	3-2	5	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2	0.40	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.0	6.88
35	T-TC	N	San Diego	W	3-1	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	7.5	9.82
37	T-NC	N	Pekin	L	1-3	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6.0	8.36
TOTALS						66	1	31	32	2	0.48	63	0.95	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	84.5	7.63