Players

Costanzo Schiavone 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	15	15	6	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	11	.273	5	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.95
3	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	14	.714	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.40
5	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	15	.667	2	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.29
6	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.79
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	8	.500	9	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.78
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.43
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	11	.182	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.36
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	10	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.10
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.51
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.04
22	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	15	.267	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.29
23	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	15	.733	1	1	3	0.20	11	.727	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.91
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	16	.438	2	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.06
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	12	.667	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.47
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	14	.786	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.58
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	10	-.100	8	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.74
39	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	11	.636	3	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.92
42	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.10
44	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	16	.500	3	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.78
45	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.80
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	11	.455	3	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.44
Total		77	169	2.19	41	238	.538	77	9	37	0.12	245	.849	.	.	.	.	210.0	6.27

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.95
3	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.40
5	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.29
6	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.79
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.78
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.43
13	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.36
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.10
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.51
19	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.04
22	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.29
23	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.91
29	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.06
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.47
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.58
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.74
39	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.92
42	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.10
44	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.78
45	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.80
47	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	2	4	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.44
Total		77	2	60	62	4	0.81	19	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	210.0	6.27