Players

Dylan Krueger 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	15	16	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	13	.846	6	4	1	1.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	20.0	10.00
3	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	14	.643	10	1	4	0.25	20	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.71
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	14	.429	14	3	2	1.00	20	.900	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.90
6	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	13	.154	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.36
7	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.65
9	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	9	.778	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.15
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	15	.467	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.32
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.14
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	15	.400	10	2	2	0.40	21	.905	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.64
18	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	16	2	1	0.67	20	.950	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.79
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	17	.765	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.96
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	14	.286	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.65
29	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	18	.778	11	2	1	0.50	19	.947	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.82
30	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.69
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	8	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.85
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.19
40	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	21	.714	8	0	1	0.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.23
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	16	.313	5	1	4	0.20	18	.778	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.69
45	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	26	.423	6	1	3	0.20	20	.850	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.82
Total		70	188	2.69	43	263	.551	128	23	33	0.33	278	.881	.	.	.	.	243.5	7.24

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	10.00
3	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.71
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.90
6	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.36
7	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.65
9	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.15
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.32
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.14
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.64
18	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.79
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.96
26	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.65
29	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.82
30	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.69
35	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.85
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.19
40	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.23
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.69
45	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.82
Total		70	4	57	61	4	0.87	28	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	243.5	7.24