Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	7.78
2	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.40	14	.857	6	1.20	8	.750	2.0	6.15
4	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	1	0.20	3	.333	1.0	4.95
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	7.91
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	4.30
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	3	1.00	3	1.000	1.0	7.08
13	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	8.12
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.20	15	.867	6	1.20	10	.600	1.0	4.25
17	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	15	5.00	17	.882	2.0	10.00
19	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	2	0.67	14	.857	4	1.33	7	.571	2.0	5.06
22	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	.700	0.0	5.54
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	6	1.000	0.0	2.81
25	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	7.10
26	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	10	.800	0.0	3.71
29	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	7.51
32	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	3.95
34	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	5.96
37	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	3.20
39	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	3.95
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	8.46
44	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	.556	0.0	4.27
45	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	5.66
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	39	9	12	0.11	108	.889	100	1.20	145	.690	9.0	5.81

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.24	21	1	.952	0.0	7.78
2	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	19	2.23	35	1	.971	2.0	6.15
4	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	17	2.14	37	2	.946	1.0	4.95
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	24	2.53	36	0	1.000	0.0	7.91
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.28	18	1	.944	0.0	4.30
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	8	2.43	14	1	.929	1.0	7.08
13	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	13	2.75	16	0	1.000	0.0	8.12
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	19	2.07	43	4	.907	1.0	4.25
17	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	6	2.45	11	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
19	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	1.91	22	3	.864	2.0	5.06
22	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	16	2.23	30	1	.967	0.0	5.54
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	12	1.94	32	2	.938	0.0	2.81
25	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	17	2.43	30	0	1.000	0.0	7.10
26	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	19	2.26	34	3	.912	0.0	3.71
29	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	11	2.30	20	0	1.000	0.0	7.51
32	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.17	24	2	.917	0.0	3.95
34	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	9	2.64	11	1	.909	0.0	5.96
37	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	5	2.00	15	1	.933	0.0	3.20
39	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	2.23	22	2	.909	0.0	3.95
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	6	2.30	10	0	1.000	0.0	8.46
44	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	11	2.35	20	1	.950	0.0	4.27
45	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	4	1.56	18	3	.833	0.0	5.66
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	141	1.70	265	2.23	519	29	.944	9.0	5.81