Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	1.15
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	4.73
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	2.60
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	3.40
19	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	.300	0.0	3.15
21	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.25	12	.667	3	0.75	8	.375	1.0	3.80
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	3.45
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	4.88
34	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	3.40
39	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	7	.857	0.0	2.36
Total		33	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	7	0.03	26	.731	24	0.73	56	.429	1.0	3.29

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	1.40	15	6	.600	0.0	1.15
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.40	15	0	1.000	0.0	4.73
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	1.92	24	3	.875	0.0	2.60
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.09	22	1	.955	0.0	3.40
19	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.89	19	3	.842	0.0	3.15
21	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	1.69	35	4	.886	1.0	3.80
25	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	21	2.18	40	2	.950	0.0	3.45
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	16	2.33	27	2	.926	0.0	4.88
34	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.13	32	5	.844	0.0	3.40
39	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	13	1.79	33	6	.818	0.0	2.36
Total		33	.	.	.	.	.	25	0.76	114	1.99	262	32	.878	1.0	3.29