Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	5.93
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	10	.400	0.0	3.60
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	2.60
13	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	3.15
15	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	6.33
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	4.13
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	3.55
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	.700	0.0	5.99
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.95
26	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	5.90
29	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	3.55
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	40	1.00	81	.494	0.0	4.43

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	14	2.17	29	1	.966	0.0	5.93
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	15	2.00	31	5	.839	0.0	3.60
11	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.92	26	3	.885	0.0	2.60
13	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	13	2.00	35	3	.914	0.0	3.15
15	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	14	2.27	22	1	.955	0.0	6.33
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.18	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.13
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	17	2.08	37	4	.892	0.0	3.55
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.21	29	1	.966	0.0	5.99
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	1.89	28	4	.857	0.0	3.95
26	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	21	2.15	40	4	.900	0.0	5.90
29	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	4	1.67	24	2	.917	0.0	3.55
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	60	1.50	143	2.05	318	28	.912	0.0	4.43