Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	2	6	-.333	11	1	3	0.25	18	.833	47	11.75	96	.490	1.5	7.32
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	25	8.33	65	.385	1.5	3.64
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	9	3	3	1.00	14	.786	32	10.67	71	.451	7.0	8.03
8	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	3	.000	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	45	9.00	104	.433	3.5	4.21
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	2	8	-.250	3	1	3	0.25	12	.750	53	13.25	83	.639	2.0	7.76
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	13	3	1	1.00	16	.938	30	10.00	65	.462	3.5	5.53
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	12	-.083	9	4	3	0.80	19	.842	61	12.20	116	.526	5.5	7.15
34	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	6	0	3	0.00	15	.800	49	12.25	89	.551	3.5	7.36
Total		31	7	0.23	11	55	-.073	55	13	17	0.42	112	.848	342	11.03	689	.496	28.0	6.38

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.32
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.64
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.03
8	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.21
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.76
13	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.53
29	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.15
34	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.36
Total		31	1	14	15	0	0.48	35	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	28.0	6.38