Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	10	.200	4	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	40	10.00	109	.367	5.5	5.16
6	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	4	1	5	0.33	12	.583	39	13.00	71	.549	3.0	8.75
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	26	8.67	60	.433	4.0	5.86
11	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	24	8.00	64	.375	1.0	3.20
12	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	7	.143	14	3	2	0.75	23	.913	38	9.50	76	.500	6.5	6.98
17	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	20	6.67	77	.260	4.0	4.48
19	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	1	.000	8	2	3	0.50	19	.842	42	10.50	91	.462	3.0	6.00
24	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	13	5	1	1.67	21	.952	44	14.67	78	.564	6.0	9.59
32	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	17	1	2	0.33	23	.913	38	12.67	63	.603	3.5	9.57
38	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	14	3	2	0.75	26	.923	49	12.25	96	.510	5.0	8.34
Total		34	12	0.35	5	44	.159	89	18	17	0.53	176	.903	360	10.59	785	.459	41.5	6.79

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.16
6	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.75
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.86
11	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.20
12	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.98
17	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.48
19	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.00
24	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.59
32	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.57
38	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.34
Total		34	2	19	21	1	0.62	43	1.26	.	.	.	.	.	41.5	6.79