Players

Daniel Diaz Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	13	11	14	9	5

Match Info							Attack					Serve						Set
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	points	rating
2	C-2	H	Teutopolis	W	3-1	4	13	3.25	1	20	.600	5	1	5	0.25	16	.688	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	6.21
3	T-WGM	N	Carlsbad	W	3-0	3	9	3.00	1	13	.615	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	6.29
5	C-2	H	Nashville	W	3-0	3	3	1.00	4	10	-.100	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	0.	0.	0.	0.	6.0	4.89
6	T-WGM	N	Columbia	W	3-0	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	9	0	1	0.00	17	.941	0.	0.	0.	0.	9.0	6.39
7	C-2	H	Antioch	W	3-0	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	9	1	2	0.33	16	.875	0.	0.	0.	0.	8.5	5.90
9	T-WGM	N	Spokane	L	0-3	3	6	2.00	4	15	.133	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	0.	0.	0.	0.	7.0	3.94
10	C-2	H	New Orleans	W	3-0	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	6	2	3	0.67	14	.786	0.	0.	0.	0.	9.5	6.25
12	T-WGM	H	Columbia	W	3-2	5	7	1.40	4	18	.167	6	1	3	0.20	19	.842	3	0.60	3	1.000	9.0	4.00
13	C-2	H	Starkville	L	0-3	3	4	1.33	5	11	-.091	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.5	2.92
14	C-2	A	Kentucky	W	3-2	5	9	1.80	4	20	.250	8	1	1	0.20	18	.944	1	0.20	1	1.000	10.0	3.95
16	T-WGM	A	Burlington	L	1-3	4	7	1.75	2	16	.313	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	2	0.50	2	1.000	8.0	3.32
17	NC	A	Schenectady	L	2-3	5	5	1.00	2	16	.188	4	1	2	0.20	13	.846	2	0.40	3	.667	9.5	3.34
19	T-2	A	New Orleans	L	0-3	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0.	0.	0.	0.	3.5	2.67
22	T-TC	N	Pekin	L	2-3	5	13	2.60	5	27	.296	2	1	1	0.20	11	.909	0	0.00	2	.000	15.5	5.15
25	NC	H	Spokane	W	3-1	4	16	4.00	3	29	.448	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	0.	0.	0.	0.	18.0	7.59
29	C-2	A	Antioch	L	0-3	3	11	3.67	9	29	.069	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	0.	0.	0.	0.	12.0	6.15
31	T-TS	N	Schenectady	W	3-1	4	12	3.00	5	25	.280	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	0.	0.	0.	0.	15.0	5.98
36	T-TS	N	Quincy	L	2-3	5	12	2.40	7	28	.179	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	0.	0.	0.	0.	13.5	4.46
TOTALS						68	149	2.19	62	317	.274	85	11	36	0.16	237	.848	9	0.13	13	.692	186.5	4.97

Match Info							Block					Dig		Receive
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	points	rating
2	C-2	H	Teutopolis	W	3-1	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	10	1.87	31	2	.935	15.0	6.21
3	T-WGM	N	Carlsbad	W	3-0	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	5	2.07	14	1	.929	12.0	6.29
5	C-2	H	Nashville	W	3-0	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	5	1.67	9	2.12	17	2	.882	6.0	4.89
6	T-WGM	N	Columbia	W	3-0	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	8	2.67	14	2.33	21	1	.952	9.0	6.39
7	C-2	H	Antioch	W	3-0	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	11	2.17	23	0	1.000	8.5	5.90
9	T-WGM	N	Spokane	L	0-3	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	9	1.83	24	5	.792	7.0	3.94
10	C-2	H	New Orleans	W	3-0	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	8	2.50	12	0	1.000	9.5	6.25
12	T-WGM	H	Columbia	W	3-2	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	15	2.21	24	2	.917	9.0	4.00
13	C-2	H	Starkville	L	0-3	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	1.92	24	4	.833	5.5	2.92
14	C-2	A	Kentucky	W	3-2	5	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	4	0.80	21	2.17	42	4	.905	10.0	3.95
16	T-WGM	A	Burlington	L	1-3	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	10	2.13	24	0	1.000	8.0	3.32
17	NC	A	Schenectady	L	2-3	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	13	1.91	33	5	.848	9.5	3.34
19	T-2	A	New Orleans	L	0-3	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	12	1.92	26	4	.846	3.5	2.67
22	T-TC	N	Pekin	L	2-3	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	17	2.19	32	4	.875	15.5	5.15
25	NC	H	Spokane	W	3-1	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	12	2.06	34	0	1.000	18.0	7.59
29	C-2	A	Antioch	L	0-3	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1	0.33	12	2.13	23	2	.913	12.0	6.15
31	T-TS	N	Schenectady	W	3-1	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	10	1.96	23	3	.870	15.0	5.98
36	T-TS	N	Quincy	L	2-3	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	14	1.97	29	4	.862	13.5	4.46
TOTALS						68	2	49	51	2	0.75	81	1.19	213	2.06	456	43	.906	186.5	4.97