Players

Match Info							Attack					Serve						Set
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	points	rating
2	C-2	H	New Orleans	W	3-1	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	14	3	2	0.75	25	.920	44	11.00	85	.518	5.0	7.10
3	T-WGM	N	Denali	W	3-1	4	4	1.00	2	12	.167	4	3	1	0.75	16	.938	48	12.00	79	.608	8.0	7.14
4	C-2	H	Baton Rouge	L	1-3	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	10	2	0	0.50	22	1.000	48	12.00	80	.600	5.5	7.81
6	T-WGM	N	Quincy	W	3-0	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	49	16.33	73	.671	1.0	7.56
7	C-2	H	Starkville	W	3-0	3	3	1.00	0	3	1.000	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	41	13.67	58	.707	6.0	9.32
9	T-WGM	N	Mendon	W	3-0	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	11	6	0	2.00	20	1.000	36	12.00	50	.720	12.0	8.33
10	C-2	H	Teutopolis	W	3-0	3	3	1.00	0	3	1.000	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	42	14.00	56	.750	5.5	9.67
12	T-WGM	H	Starkville	W	3-0	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	39	13.00	51	.765	2.5	8.26
14	C-2	H	Antioch	W	3-1	4	5	1.25	0	6	.833	9	0	1	0.00	20	.950	53	13.25	78	.679	6.5	9.84
16	T-WGM	H	Quincy	W	3-2	5	5	1.00	3	10	.200	5	1	2	0.20	19	.895	67	13.40	97	.691	6.0	7.94
19	T-2	A	Teutopolis	W	3-2	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	9	3	0	0.60	24	1.000	60	12.00	89	.674	5.0	6.83
20	T-WGM	A	Antioch	W	3-0	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	7	3	1	1.00	16	.938	47	15.67	64	.734	5.0	9.55
22	T-TC	N	St. Charles	W	3-0	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	43	14.33	57	.754	3.5	8.96
24	T-WGM	A	San Jose	L	1-3	4	4	1.00	1	6	.500	3	0	4	0.00	16	.750	53	13.25	78	.679	5.0	8.26
25	NC	H	Alton	W	3-0	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	9	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	34	11.33	45	.756	6.0	8.45
26	NC	A	Pekin	W	3-1	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	4	1	3	0.25	17	.824	50	12.50	78	.641	4.5	8.03
30	T-TC	N	Alton	W	3-0	3	0	0.00	2	2	-1.000	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	44	14.67	54	.815	1.0	9.19
32	T-NC	N	Pekin	L	2-3	5	3	0.60	2	9	.111	7	4	4	0.80	21	.810	53	10.60	86	.616	8.0	5.78
34	C-2	H	Kentucky	W	3-0	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	5	3	2	1.00	13	.846	38	12.67	47	.809	5.5	9.22
35	T-TC	N	Columbia	L	2-3	5	4	0.80	0	5	.800	6	3	7	0.60	20	.650	66	13.20	93	.710	9.0	8.48
TOTALS						74	50	0.68	12	92	.413	126	38	37	0.51	336	.890	955	12.91	1398	.683	110.5	8.29

Match Info							Block					Dig		Receive
m	comp	ven	opponent	result		sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	points	rating
2	C-2	H	New Orleans	W	3-1	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.0	7.10
3	T-WGM	N	Denali	W	3-1	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	8.0	7.14
4	C-2	H	Baton Rouge	L	1-3	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.5	7.81
6	T-WGM	N	Quincy	W	3-0	3	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1.0	7.56
7	C-2	H	Starkville	W	3-0	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6.0	9.32
9	T-WGM	N	Mendon	W	3-0	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	12.0	8.33
10	C-2	H	Teutopolis	W	3-0	3	0	5	5	2	1.67	1	0.33	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.5	9.67
12	T-WGM	H	Starkville	W	3-0	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	3	1.00	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	2.5	8.26
14	C-2	H	Antioch	W	3-1	4	1	1	2	2	0.50	7	1.75	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6.5	9.84
16	T-WGM	H	Quincy	W	3-2	5	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	3	0.60	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6.0	7.94
19	T-2	A	Teutopolis	W	3-2	5	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	3	0.60	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.0	6.83
20	T-WGM	A	Antioch	W	3-0	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.0	9.55
22	T-TC	N	St. Charles	W	3-0	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	3.5	8.96
24	T-WGM	A	San Jose	L	1-3	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.0	8.26
25	NC	H	Alton	W	3-0	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	6.0	8.45
26	NC	A	Pekin	W	3-1	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	4.5	8.03
30	T-TC	N	Alton	W	3-0	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	1.0	9.19
32	T-NC	N	Pekin	L	2-3	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	8.0	5.78
34	C-2	H	Kentucky	W	3-0	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	5.5	9.22
35	T-TC	N	Columbia	L	2-3	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	9.0	8.48
TOTALS						74	4	37	41	6	0.55	62	0.84	0.	0.	0.	0.	0.	110.5	8.29