Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	5.58
2	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	6.53
4	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	2.75
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.33	12	.833	9	3.00	12	.750	1.0	10.00
7	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	3	0.50	16	.813	5	1.25	8	.625	2.0	9.28
8	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.20	13	.769	6	1.20	10	.600	1.0	4.80
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	.889	0.0	3.33
11	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	.600	0.0	5.90
13	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	3	1.00	15	.800	0	0.00	3	.000	3.0	7.75
14	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.25	10	.900	6	1.50	10	.600	1.0	7.69
18	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	6.98
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	2.60
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	4.78
22	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	4.65
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	5.43
32	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	7.05
36	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	12	.917	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.43
37	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.20	14	.786	4	0.80	8	.500	1.0	5.83
39	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	2	0.00	15	.867	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	5.30
41	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.25	11	.727	4	1.00	6	.667	1.0	4.20
44	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	6	2.00	8	.750	1.0	7.07
46	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	6.36
Total		82	.	.	.	.	.	69	11	23	0.13	173	.867	88	1.07	138	.638	11.0	5.88

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.33	18	1	.944	0.0	5.58
2	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	2.13	15	0	1.000	0.0	6.53
4	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	6	1.94	16	1	.938	0.0	2.75
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	6	2.55	11	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
7	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	15	2.60	20	0	1.000	2.0	9.28
8	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	12	2.12	25	3	.880	1.0	4.80
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	1	1.83	12	0	1.000	0.0	3.33
11	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	16	2.17	30	3	.900	0.0	5.90
13	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.29	17	0	1.000	3.0	7.75
14	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	16	2.70	20	0	1.000	1.0	7.69
18	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	12	2.29	21	1	.952	0.0	6.98
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	1.85	13	1	.923	0.0	2.60
21	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	16	2.19	32	1	.969	0.0	4.78
22	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	16	2.06	35	5	.857	0.0	4.65
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	1.90	20	3	.850	0.0	5.43
32	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	21	2.36	33	3	.909	0.0	7.05
36	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	1.78	18	2	.889	0.0	5.43
37	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	20	2.34	38	2	.947	1.0	5.83
39	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	2.10	20	3	.850	0.0	5.30
41	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	2.04	23	2	.913	1.0	4.20
44	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.04	23	1	.957	1.0	7.07
46	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.24	17	2	.882	0.0	6.36
Total		82	.	.	.	.	.	158	1.93	243	2.19	477	34	.929	11.0	5.88