Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (2)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Sheboygan Vampire Bats

John Holden

(N)
Neutral Court

Santa Clara Chihuahuas

Martyn Hathaway

Sheboygan leads series 13-5

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Sheboygan			Santa Clara
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
92.50	A	Libero		A-	88.00
85.25	B+	Middle Blockers		B-	77.25
85.25	B+	Outside Hitters		B-	75.25
90.00	A	Right Side		B	80.75
81.00	B	Setter		B-	74.50
		Skills Prediction

	18 MATCHES
13	WINS	5
7	HOME	3
3	AWAY	0
3	NEUTRAL	2

Sheboygan		Santa Clara
#15	ELO Rank	#31

1,520.64	ELO Rating	1,325.55

65.9%	ELO Winning Chance	34.1%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.341 22nd	ATTACK PCT	.243 32nd
12.80 17th	KILLS PER SET	11.57 31st
.862 18th	SERVE PCT	.837 32nd
1.77 5th	ACES PER SET	1.23 30th
.541 23rd	ASSIST PCT	.469 31st
12.38 18th	ASSISTS PER SET	11.3 31st
4.59 5th	BLOCKS PER SET	3.78 24th
6.76 7th	DIGS PER SET	7.25 1st
.921 11th	RECEIVE PCT	.918 17th
2.177 12th	PASSER RATING	2.172 14th

	TOP TWO
McNaughton (RS) 280 Maier (OH) 259	KILLS	Rojas (RS) 319 Schumann (MB) 226
Klein (MB) .521 Dagostino (RS) .482	ATTACK PCT	Schumann (MB) .461 Rojas (RS) .370
Applemansion (S) 905 Pennyslider (S) 299	ASSISTS	Meyer (S) 946 Sheridan (S) 290
Applemansion (S) 36 Klein (MB) 24	ACES	Halversen (L) 22 Rojas (RS) 20
Moscone (MB) 79 Klein (MB) 76	BLOCKS	Schumann (MB) 81 Green (MB) 61
Guffy (L) 127 Maier (OH) 87	DIGS	Halversen (L) 151 Alvarez (L) 121
Guffy (L) 2.34 Worsley (OH) 2.29	PASSER RTG	Alvarez (L) 2.35 Halversen (L) 2.26

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
12.	Bauer Guffy Soph. A- 2.34 Passer Rating 1.81 Digs Per Set	6.48
13.	Cesar Alvarez Soph. A- 2.35 Passer Rating 1.86 Digs Per Set	6.40

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
8.		Magnus Applemansion Senior B- 12.23 Assists Per Set 2.03 Service Pts Per Set	7.93

#	TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
2.	Gage McNaughton Soph. B+ 4.18 Kills Per Set 0.63 Blocks Per Set	7.87
7.	Dani Rojas Junior B 3.54 Kills Per Set 0.58 Blocks Per Set	7.29

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
11.		Jonas Klein Senior B 1.04 Blocks Per Set 2.49 Kills Per Set	7.43

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	4	Aug 29, 2020	3	-	0	25-14	25-7	25-20			Western Conference	1	-	0
1	15	Sep 19, 2020	0	-	3	18-25	20-25	14-25			Western Conference	2	-	0
2	7	Jan 30, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-18	25-15	25-23			William G. Morgan Cup2-7Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	0
2	11	Feb 13, 2021	2	-	3	19-25	21-25	25-21	25-23	13-15	Western Conference	3	-	1
2	22	Feb 27, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	11-25	18-25			Western Conference Tournament2-22Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	4	-	1
2	28	Mar 13, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	25-23	13-25	20-25		Western Conference	5	-	1
2	42	Apr 03, 2021	3	- (n)	1	25-23	18-25	25-22	25-22		TMVL Cup	6	-	1
3	11	Sep 11, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	23-25	23-25			Western Conference	7	-	1
3	22	Sep 25, 2021	0	-	3	10-25	12-25	13-25			Western Conference Tournament3-22Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	8	-	1
3	28	Oct 09, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	18-25	26-28			Western Conference	8	-	2
4	5	Dec 04, 2021	3	-	0	39-37	27-25	25-18			Western Conference	9	-	2
4	24	Jan 08, 2022	1	-	3	25-22	15-25	17-25	24-26		Western Conference	10	-	2
5	6	Apr 16, 2022	0	- (n)	3	16-25	18-25	12-25			William G. Morgan Cup5-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	3
5	18	May 14, 2022	2	-	3	28-26	21-25	25-18	21-25	12-15	Non-Conference	10	-	4
8	33	Apr 16, 2023	3	- (n)	0	25-17	25-15	25-22			Holyoke Invitational8-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	11	-	4
9	6	Jun 04, 2023	1	- (n)	3	25-23	20-25	18-25	24-26		William G. Morgan Cup9-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	11	-	5
9	21	Jul 09, 2023	2	-	3	17-25	20-25	26-24	25-17	16-18	Non-Conference	12	-	5
10	21	Oct 22, 2023	3	-	2	22-25	25-19	25-19	31-33	15-12	Non-Conference	13	-	5
14	6	Dec 22, 2024	1	- (n)	3	25-23	20-25	16-25	21-25		William G. Morgan Cup14-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	13	-	6

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.