Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (2)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Burlington Bullfrogs

Aires Martins Jr

(N)
Neutral Court

Albuquerque Raccoons

James Bucknall

Burlington leads series 12-6

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Burlington			Albuquerque
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
79.50	B	Libero		C	67.50
89.00	A-	Middle Blockers		B	78.75
82.75	B+	Outside Hitters		B+	84.38
74.00	B-	Right Side		B+	83.75
77.00	B-	Setter		A-	88.25
		Skills Prediction

	18 MATCHES
12	WINS	6
4	HOME	3
4	AWAY	2
4	NEUTRAL	1

Burlington		Albuquerque
#17	ELO Rank	#35

1,529.06	ELO Rating	1,490.31

55.6%	ELO Winning Chance	44.4%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.335 5th	ATTACK PCT	.325 8th
12.00 12th	KILLS PER SET	11.91 13th
.857 14th	SERVE PCT	.844 21st
2.09 7th	ACES PER SET	1.45 22nd
.516 6th	ASSIST PCT	.527 5th
11.45 10th	ASSISTS PER SET	11.45 11th
4.27 16th	BLOCKS PER SET	6.36 5th
8.82 11th	DIGS PER SET	7.09 29th
.927 9th	RECEIVE PCT	.916 14th
2.190 5th	PASSER RATING	2.116 17th

	TOP TWO
Weigand (OH) 23 Holt (RS) 20	KILLS	Irvin (OH) 30 Sharpe (OH) 27
Santos (MB) .800 Douglas (MB) .688	ATTACK PCT	Sharpe (OH) .579 Irwin (MB) .550
Ramos (S) 67 Loup (S) 48	ASSISTS	Firth (S) 81 Kaiser (S) 37
Santos (MB) 8 Blackburn (RS) 3	ACES	Tucker (L) 4 van Doorn (RS) 3
Santos (MB) 11 Weigand (OH) 7	BLOCKS	Maldonado (MB) 14 Irvin (OH) 10
Steinbach (L) 17 van der Horst (L) 14	DIGS	Tucker (L) 20 Irvin (OH) 14
Weigand (OH) 2.50 Steinbach (L) 2.39	PASSER RTG	Sharpe (OH) 2.29 Filemoni (L) 2.19

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
15.		Felix van der Horst Senior B 2.34 Passer Rating 2.33 Digs Per Set	7.36

#	TOP SETTERS	Rtg
8.	Hugh Firth Junior A- 11.57 Assists Per Set 1.86 Service Pts Per Set	7.59
10.	Arturo Ramos Soph. B- 11.17 Assists Per Set 3.33 Service Pts Per Set	7.42

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
4.		Karsten Weigand Senior B+ 3.83 Kills Per Set 2.50 Passer Rating	8.58

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
7.	Juan Santos Senior A 1.83 Blocks Per Set 2.17 Kills Per Set	8.58
13.	Ramon Maldonado Junior B- 1.75 Blocks Per Set 1.75 Kills Per Set	8.00

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	5	Aug 29, 2020	3	-	2	25-21	20-25	23-25	25-14	16-14	Western Conference	0	-	1
1	21	Oct 03, 2020	3	-	2	16-25	25-21	25-19	21-25	15-6	Western Conference	1	-	1
2	11	Feb 13, 2021	0	-	3	19-25	24-26	22-25			Western Conference	2	-	1
2	14	Feb 13, 2021	0	- (n)	3	20-25	23-25	24-26			TMVL Cup2-14Quarterfinals TMVL Cup	2	-	2
2	28	Mar 13, 2021	1	-	3	27-25	23-25	23-25	24-26		Western Conference	2	-	3
3	11	Sep 11, 2021	3	-	1	18-25	25-23	25-22	25-23		Western Conference	3	-	3
3	28	Oct 09, 2021	2	-	3	14-25	14-25	25-23	25-23	9-15	Western Conference	4	-	3
3	38	Oct 23, 2021	3	- (n)	1	30-28	20-25	25-21	25-17		TMVL Shield	5	-	3
4	2	Nov 27, 2021	1	-	3	26-24	23-25	25-27	20-25		Western Conference	5	-	4
4	12	Dec 18, 2021	1	-	3	30-28	13-25	17-25	15-25		Western Conference	6	-	4
4	19	Dec 25, 2021	3	-	1	27-25	17-25	25-19	25-19		William G. Morgan Cup4-19Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	4
4	22	Jan 01, 2022	0	-	3	18-25	11-25	22-25			Western Conference Tournament4-22Quarterfinals Western Conference Tournament	8	-	4
7	6	Nov 19, 2022	3	- (n)	1	25-23	26-28	25-16	25-17		William G. Morgan Cup7-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	9	-	4
12	26	Jun 17, 2024	3	-	1	25-16	23-25	25-22	25-23		Non-Conference	10	-	4
13	6	Sep 22, 2024	3	- (n)	1	23-25	25-19	25-14	25-18		William G. Morgan Cup13-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	11	-	4
16	21	Oct 26, 2025	2	-	3	23-25	25-19	26-24	21-25	8-15	Non-Conference	11	-	5
16	36	Nov 16, 2025	3	- (n)	1	25-18	25-17	23-25	25-17		TMVL Shield	12	-	5
17	21	Mar 22, 2026	3	-	1	26-24	25-22	21-25	25-22		Non-Conference	12	-	6
18	6	Aug 09, 2026									William G. Morgan Cup18-6Group Round William G. Morgan Cup

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.