Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Holyoke Invitational Sweet 16

Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Schenectady Squirrels

Brian Beerman

(N)
Neutral Court

Antioch Anglerfish

Rob Peterson

Antioch leads series 11-9

Match Comments

Ah, we meet again Mr. Peterson. Please keep those Anglers on a leash.

Brian (Schenectady) Feb 04 - 2:31 PM

They have long and pointy teeth. All the better to bite down on tasty snacks with.

Rob (Antioch) Feb 09 - 2:05 AM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Schenectady			Antioch
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
76.50	B-	Libero		A-	86.25
81.13	B	Middle Blockers		B+	85.63
85.38	B+	Outside Hitters		B+	85.38
87.00	A-	Right Side		B+	85.00
75.25	B-	Setter		B+	82.75
		Skills Prediction

	20 MATCHES
9	WINS	11
4	HOME	6
1	AWAY	1
4	NEUTRAL	4

Schenectady		Antioch
#29	ELO Rank	#12

1,395.18	ELO Rating	1,528.45

45.5%	ELO Winning Chance	54.5%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.282 29th	ATTACK PCT	.345 20th
11.90 29th	KILLS PER SET	12.54 22nd
.859 21st	SERVE PCT	.875 2nd
1.05 32nd	ACES PER SET	1.68 9th
.503 30th	ASSIST PCT	.545 18th
11.54 30th	ASSISTS PER SET	12.19 20th
4.33 9th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.83 2nd
6.6 13th	DIGS PER SET	6.66 11th
.903 31st	RECEIVE PCT	.916 21st
2.105 32nd	PASSER RATING	2.152 21st

	TOP TWO
Clarke (OH) 299 Hirsch (RS) 250	KILLS	Casebeer (OH) 294 Biederman (OH) 268
Clarke (OH) .548 Morgan (MB) .406	ATTACK PCT	Casebeer (OH) .447 Williams (MB) .426
Munson (S) 691 Marshal (S) 443	ASSISTS	Samuel (S) 865 Cook (S) 410
Clarke (OH) 28 Munson (S) 16	ACES	Samuel (S) 29 Ressler (OH) 27
Peart (MB) 74 Clarke (OH) 67	BLOCKS	Mooney (MB) 91 Williams (MB) 73
Beerman (L) 155 Clarke (OH) 93	DIGS	Street (L) 166 Biederman (OH) 90
Clarke (OH) 2.35 Beerman (L) 2.15	PASSER RTG	Street (L) 2.32 Biederman (OH) 2.22

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
9.		Jason Street Junior B 2.32 Passer Rating 2.27 Digs Per Set	7.05

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
7.		Landry Clarke Junior A- 3.88 Kills Per Set 2.35 Passer Rating	7.70

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
6.		Jerome Hirsch Senior B 3.38 Kills Per Set 0.80 Blocks Per Set	7.36

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	17	Sep 26, 2020	3	-	2	22-25	25-19	19-25	25-19	15-12	Non-Conference	0	-	1
2	29	Mar 13, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	18-25	25-18	16-25		Non-Conference	1	-	1
3	29	Oct 09, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	25-27	25-17	27-29		Non-Conference	1	-	2
3	43	Oct 30, 2021	0	- (n)	3	14-25	19-25	23-25			TMVL Shield	2	-	2
3	45	Oct 30, 2021	3	- (n)	1	25-19	16-25	29-27	25-15		Holyoke Invitational3-45CHAMPIONSHIP HOLYOKE INVITATIONAL	3	-	2
4	7	Dec 04, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-11	25-14	25-12			William G. Morgan Cup4-7Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	3
4	32	Jan 22, 2022	1	-	3	19-25	15-25	28-26	18-25		Non-Conference	3	-	4
4	34	Jan 22, 2022	1	- (n)	3	21-25	23-25	25-22	24-26		National Championship4-34Quarterfinals National Championship	4	-	4
5	3	Apr 09, 2022	3	- (n)	0	25-17	25-23	25-16			William G. Morgan Cup5-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	5	-	4
5	25	May 28, 2022	1	-	3	22-25	28-30	26-24	19-25		Non-Conference	5	-	5
6	26	Sep 17, 2022	2	-	3	25-23	11-25	16-25	25-18	15-17	Non-Conference	6	-	5
7	16	Dec 17, 2022	1	-	3	25-20	20-25	25-27	23-25		William G. Morgan Cup7-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	6
8	25	Apr 09, 2023	1	-	3	15-25	18-25	25-21	20-25		Non-Conference	6	-	7
9	25	Jul 16, 2023	3	-	2	22-25	25-21	21-25	26-24	16-14	Non-Conference	7	-	7
10	17	Oct 15, 2023	1	-	3	19-25	27-25	19-25	20-25		Non-Conference	7	-	8
11	33	Feb 11, 2024	3	- (n)	0	25-16	25-14	25-15			Holyoke Invitational11-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	7	-	9
13	9	Sep 29, 2024	3	- (n)	0	25-13	25-19	25-16			William G. Morgan Cup13-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	7	-	10
13	25	Nov 03, 2024	1	-	3	27-25	21-25	19-25	23-25		Non-Conference	8	-	10
14	9	Dec 29, 2024	3	- (n)	1	25-12	18-25	25-13	25-16		William G. Morgan Cup14-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	8	-	11
14	17	Jan 21, 2025	0	-	3	20-25	18-25	21-25			Non-Conference	9	-	11
14	33	Feb 16, 2025	0	- (n)	3	24-26	19-25	16-25			Holyoke Invitational14-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	9	-	12

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.