Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Semifinals

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Nashville Red Pandas

Roy Rolsten

(H)
at San Jose

San Jose Shrimps

Vick Hall

Series even at 6-6

Match Comments

Nashville has never made the WGM Finals. San Jose has once, not yet won it.

Kevin (New Orleans) Oct 22 - 9:54 PM

We're going to need some luck to beat the Shrimps at San Jose

Roy (Nashville) Oct 24 - 11:41 PM

Massive SEMI! Can Mr. Hall slow down the surging Red Pandas?

Allan (Quincy) Oct 25 - 12:10 AM

despite the home advantage the Pandas are the favorites here.

Vick (San Jose) Oct 26 - 10:29 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Nashville			San Jose
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
98.50	A+	Libero		B+	83.75
95.50	A+	Middle Blockers		A+	102.50
90.13	A	Outside Hitters		A-	88.50
99.00	A+	Right Side		A+	102.75
95.50	A+	Setter		A-	87.25
		Skills Prediction

	12 MATCHES
6	WINS	6
2	HOME	1
1	AWAY	1
3	NEUTRAL	4

Nashville		San Jose
#12	ELO Rank	#5

1,537.78	ELO Rating	1,576.24 (+145)

26.6%	ELO Winning Chance	73.4%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.367 14th	ATTACK PCT	.384 10th
12.46 19th	KILLS PER SET	12.77 15th
.876 3rd	SERVE PCT	.871 7th
1.7 13th	ACES PER SET	1.73 8th
.558 16th	ASSIST PCT	.576 8th
11.91 21st	ASSISTS PER SET	12.41 14th
4.2 14th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.73 4th
5.46 32nd	DIGS PER SET	6.28 26th
.912 22nd	RECEIVE PCT	.913 21st
2.145 21st	PASSER RATING	2.152 18th

	TOP TWO
Brousard (RS) 284 Dibbley (OH) 210	KILLS	Scilacci (OH) 315 Stearn (MB) 197
McTiernan (MB) .601 Brousard (RS) .591	ATTACK PCT	Scilacci (OH) .592 Stearn (MB) .576
Davola (S) 955 Cutter (S) 252	ASSISTS	Leak (S) 948 Clemente (S) 361
Davola (S) 38 Brousard (RS) 30	ACES	Stearn (MB) 52 Leak (S) 28
McTiernan (MB) 80 McAdoo (MB) 61	BLOCKS	Stearn (MB) 75 Biscardi (MB) 74
Sobchak (L) 146 Dibbley (OH) 68	DIGS	Gomez (L) 94 Booth (OH) 83
Sobchak (L) 2.34 Dibbley (OH) 2.30	PASSER RTG	Muller (L) 2.46 Walker (L) 2.38

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
7.		Walter Sobchak Senior A 2.34 Passer Rating 1.97 Digs Per Set	7.02

#	TOP SETTERS	Rtg
1.	Joe Davola Senior A 12.91 Assists Per Set 1.70 Service Pts Per Set	8.29
6.	Kelly Leak Soph. B 12.64 Assists Per Set 1.92 Service Pts Per Set	8.01

#	TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
1.	Dane Brousard Junior A 3.84 Kills Per Set 0.80 Blocks Per Set	7.90
8.	Jack Lombardo Senior A 2.43 Kills Per Set 0.93 Blocks Per Set	6.97

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
5.	John McTiernan Junior A 1.08 Blocks Per Set 2.70 Kills Per Set	7.85
6.	Emmanuel Biscardi Junior A 1.07 Blocks Per Set 2.75 Kills Per Set	7.74
13.	Bill Stearn Senior A 0.99 Blocks Per Set 2.59 Kills Per Set	7.34

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	26	May 28, 2022	1	-	3	25-22	23-25	13-25	14-25		Non-Conference	0	-	1
5	31	Jun 04, 2022	2	- (n)	3	26-24	28-26	24-26	18-25	15-17	TMVL Shield5-31Sweet 16 TMVL Shield	0	-	2
6	12	Aug 20, 2022	0	-	3	17-25	23-25	16-25			William G. Morgan Cup6-12Round of 32 William G. Morgan Cup	1	-	2
6	32	Sep 24, 2022	0	- (n)	3	19-25	14-25	21-25			National Championship6-32Sweet 16 National Championship	1	-	3
6	40	Oct 08, 2022	3	- (n)	1	25-16	20-25	25-21	25-19		TMVL Cup	2	-	3
7	38	Jan 21, 2023	1	- (n)	3	21-25	25-23	30-32	27-29		Holyoke Invitational7-38Quarterfinals Holyoke Invitational	2	-	4
9	18	Jul 02, 2023	0	-	3	19-25	22-25	18-25			Non-Conference	3	-	4
9	37	Jul 30, 2023	0	- (n)	3	21-25	23-25	18-25			National Championship9-37Quarterfinals National Championship	4	-	4
10	40	Nov 19, 2023	3	- (n)	2	25-21	25-23	21-25	16-25	17-15	TMVL Cup	5	-	4
11	3	Dec 17, 2023	3	- (n)	0	25-17	25-12	25-14			William G. Morgan Cup11-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	5	-	5
12	18	Jun 03, 2024	3	-	1	25-16	25-27	25-21	25-15		Non-Conference	6	-	5
13	15	Oct 13, 2024	3	-	2	25-15	14-25	25-27	25-18	15-12	Non-Conference	6	-	6
13	24	Oct 27, 2024	1	-	3	27-29	17-25	25-16	19-25		William G. Morgan Cup13-24SEMIFINALS William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	7

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.