Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 3

Why Do I Care?

Baton Rouge Bananas

Mike Halpin

(H)
at Nashville

Nashville Red Pandas

Roy Rolsten

Baton Rouge leads series 15-8

Match Comments

Lots of lovely green ticks for the Pandas

Roy (Nashville) Sep 20 - 9:36 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Baton Rouge			Nashville
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
89.75	A-	Libero		A+	100.75
80.13	B	Middle Blockers		A+	100.25
84.63	B+	Outside Hitters		A	93.63
94.75	A+	Right Side		A+	103.75
80.75	B	Setter		A+	97.25
		Skills Prediction

	23 MATCHES
15	WINS	8
10	HOME	6
2	AWAY	1
3	NEUTRAL	1

Baton Rouge		Nashville
#11	ELO Rank	#12

1,540.85	ELO Rating	1,537.78 (+145)

22.4%	ELO Winning Chance	77.6%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.391 7th	ATTACK PCT	.367 14th
13.03 12th	KILLS PER SET	12.46 19th
.869 8th	SERVE PCT	.876 3rd
1.39 22nd	ACES PER SET	1.7 13th
.577 7th	ASSIST PCT	.558 16th
12.67 12th	ASSISTS PER SET	11.91 21st
3.98 19th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.2 14th
6.28 25th	DIGS PER SET	5.46 32nd
.907 28th	RECEIVE PCT	.912 22nd
2.159 15th	PASSER RATING	2.145 21st

	TOP TWO
Hawke (RS) 251 Tate (OH) 207	KILLS	Brousard (RS) 284 Dibbley (OH) 210
Tate (OH) .547 Catanzaro (OH) .523	ATTACK PCT	McTiernan (MB) .601 Brousard (RS) .591
O’Brien (S) 837 Wilson (S) 460	ASSISTS	Davola (S) 955 Cutter (S) 252
Antonio (MB) 30 Staples (L) 21	ACES	Davola (S) 38 Brousard (RS) 30
Campos (MB) 61 Tate (OH) 53	BLOCKS	McTiernan (MB) 80 McAdoo (MB) 61
Staples (L) 147 Williams (L) 83	DIGS	Sobchak (L) 146 Dibbley (OH) 68
Staples (L) 2.31 Tate (OH) 2.30	PASSER RTG	Sobchak (L) 2.34 Dibbley (OH) 2.30

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
6.	Julien Staples Junior B+ 2.31 Passer Rating 2.16 Digs Per Set	7.07
7.	Walter Sobchak Senior A 2.34 Passer Rating 1.97 Digs Per Set	7.02

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
1.		Joe Davola Senior A 12.91 Assists Per Set 1.70 Service Pts Per Set	8.29

#	TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
1.	Dane Brousard Junior A 3.84 Kills Per Set 0.80 Blocks Per Set	7.90
4.	CJ Hawke Senior A- 3.80 Kills Per Set 0.56 Blocks Per Set	7.27

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
5.		John McTiernan Junior A 1.08 Blocks Per Set 2.70 Kills Per Set	7.85

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	5	Apr 16, 2022	3	-	1	28-26	22-25	25-20	25-14		SEC	1	-	0
5	39	Jun 18, 2022	0	-	3	21-25	22-25	11-25			SEC	2	-	0
6	5	Aug 06, 2022	3	-	0	25-9	25-23	25-15			SEC	3	-	0
6	24	Sep 10, 2022	1	-	3	17-25	20-25	25-22	18-25		William G. Morgan Cup6-24SEMIFINALS William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	0
6	35	Oct 01, 2022	1	- (n)	3	25-23	18-25	23-25	20-25		TMVL Cup	5	-	0
6	39	Oct 08, 2022	0	-	3	19-25	24-26	21-25			SEC	6	-	0
7	1	Nov 12, 2022	1	-	3	20-25	16-25	25-16	24-26		SEC	6	-	1
7	10	Dec 10, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	21-25	14-25			SEC	7	-	1
7	19	Dec 24, 2022	0	-	3	22-25	21-25	12-25			SEC Tournament7-19Quarterfinals SEC Tournament	8	-	1
8	8	Mar 05, 2023	2	-	3	25-15	25-18	23-25	20-25	13-15	SEC	8	-	2
8	34	Apr 23, 2023	3	-	0	25-18	25-15	25-21			SEC	8	-	3
8	40	Apr 30, 2023	0	- (n)	3	18-25	19-25	25-27			TMVL Cup	9	-	3
9	7	Jun 11, 2023	2	-	3	25-21	25-21	30-32	21-25	17-19	SEC	9	-	4
9	23	Jul 09, 2023	2	-	3	25-20	28-30	25-21	19-25	9-15	SEC Tournament9-23Semifinals SEC Tournament	10	-	4
9	29	Jul 23, 2023	0	-	3	20-25	16-25	13-25			SEC	11	-	4
10	2	Sep 10, 2023	2	-	3	17-25	25-23	20-25	25-21	10-15	SEC	12	-	4
10	11	Oct 01, 2023	1	-	3	20-25	23-25	25-22	18-25		SEC	12	-	5
10	30	Nov 05, 2023	3	- (n)	0	25-17	27-25	25-20			TMVL Cup10-30Sweet 16 TMVL Cup	13	-	5
11	2	Dec 17, 2023	0	-	3	17-25	9-25	6-25			SEC	13	-	6
11	11	Jan 07, 2024	0	-	3	28-30	15-25	18-25			SEC	14	-	6
11	22	Jan 30, 2024	0	- (n)	3	21-25	15-25	14-25			TMVL Cup11-22Round of 32 TMVL Cup	14	-	7
12	1	Apr 28, 2024	0	-	3	23-25	15-25	23-25			SEC	15	-	7
12	10	May 20, 2024	1	-	3	21-25	25-22	15-25	23-25		SEC	15	-	8
13	4	Sep 22, 2024	3	-	1	25-23	18-25	25-22	26-24		SEC	16	-	8
13	13	Oct 13, 2024	0	-	3	13-25	9-25	16-25			SEC	17	-	8

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.