Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Round 2

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

San Diego Swordfish

Matt White

(H)
at Mendon

Mendon Mushrooms

Pierre van Rossum

Mendon leads series 12-6

Match Comments

Story of our season more ticks against us than for us.

Matt (San Diego) Oct 03 - 10:10 AM

A cup game is always difficult, escpecially against the Swordfish.

Pierre (Mendon) Oct 05 - 11:52 AM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

San Diego			Mendon
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
60.75	D+	Libero		B+	84.75
86.25	A-	Middle Blockers		B+	83.38
75.38	B-	Outside Hitters		A	91.88
80.75	B	Right Side		B	81.50
62.00	C-	Setter		A-	87.00
		Skills Prediction

	18 MATCHES
6	WINS	12
3	HOME	4
2	AWAY	3
1	NEUTRAL	5

San Diego		Mendon
#28	ELO Rank	#7

1,422.29	ELO Rating	1,538.19 (+145)

19.3%	ELO Winning Chance	80.7%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.250 29th	ATTACK PCT	.344 9th
11.81 23rd	KILLS PER SET	12.82 7th
.884 2nd	SERVE PCT	.868 7th
1.31 27th	ACES PER SET	1.39 20th
.487 26th	ASSIST PCT	.54 8th
11.57 23rd	ASSISTS PER SET	12.24 12th
3.67 28th	BLOCKS PER SET	5.55 3rd
6.98 18th	DIGS PER SET	7.74 9th
.896 32nd	RECEIVE PCT	.918 16th
2.077 32nd	PASSER RATING	2.159 16th

	TOP TWO
Silva (OH) 85 Barrelbagel (OH) 80	KILLS	Ramos (OH) 72 Alpha (RS) 68
Lindstrom (RS) .416 Buglioni (MB) .370	ATTACK PCT	Brower (OH) .670 Fonteles (MB) .584
Ferrara (S) 271 Jeppy (S) 169	ASSISTS	Strand (S) 310 Toniutti (S) 119
Alves (MB) 12 Buglioni (MB) 8	ACES	Brower (OH) 8 Alpha (RS) 8
Alves (MB) 24 Buglioni (MB) 23	BLOCKS	Rudolph (MB) 32 Fonteles (MB) 24
Silva (OH) 44 Hall (L) 35	DIGS	Tillie (L) 66 Strand (S) 36
Silva (OH) 2.38 Barrelbagel (OH) 2.18	PASSER RTG	Brower (OH) 2.40 Tillie (L) 2.30

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
11.		Olivier Tillie Senior B- 2.30 Passer Rating 2.54 Digs Per Set	7.28

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
7.		Peter Brower Senior A- 3.58 Kills Per Set 2.40 Passer Rating	7.99

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
8.		Stephan Alpha Junior C+ 2.72 Kills Per Set 0.84 Blocks Per Set	7.55

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
5.	Thorsten Rudolph Junior C+ 1.68 Blocks Per Set 2.11 Kills Per Set	8.21
13.	Eder Fonteles Junior C+ 1.26 Blocks Per Set 2.89 Kills Per Set	7.77

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	5	Aug 29, 2020	0	-	3	20-25	16-25	26-28			Eastern Conference	0	-	1
1	21	Oct 03, 2020	0	-	3	18-25	20-25	17-25			Eastern Conference	1	-	1
2	1	Jan 23, 2021	1	-	3	25-11	17-25	18-25	18-25		Eastern Conference	2	-	1
2	7	Jan 30, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-20	25-18	25-21			William G. Morgan Cup2-7Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	2
2	12	Feb 13, 2021	0	-	3	22-25	18-25	13-25			Eastern Conference	2	-	3
2	15	Feb 13, 2021	3	- (n)	0	25-13	25-12	25-13			TMVL Shield2-15Quarterfinals TMVL Shield	2	-	4
3	1	Aug 21, 2021	2	-	3	25-20	23-25	25-12	23-25	12-15	Eastern Conference	2	-	5
3	12	Sep 11, 2021	3	-	0	25-18	25-18	25-23			Eastern Conference	2	-	6
3	19	Sep 18, 2021	0	-	3	17-25	17-25	16-25			William G. Morgan Cup3-19Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	7
3	35	Oct 16, 2021	2	- (n)	3	23-25	23-25	25-23	25-21	12-15	Holyoke Invitational3-35Quarterfinals Holyoke Invitational	2	-	8
4	2	Nov 27, 2021	3	-	2	25-23	19-25	23-25	27-25	15-13	Eastern Conference	3	-	8
4	12	Dec 18, 2021	3	-	2	28-30	25-18	15-25	25-18	15-12	Eastern Conference	3	-	9
4	38	Jan 29, 2022	3	- (n)	1	25-23	25-18	24-26	25-22		TMVL Shield	4	-	9
10	21	Oct 22, 2023	0	-	3	19-25	16-25	21-25			Non-Conference	5	-	9
10	46	Nov 26, 2023	3	- (n)	1	22-25	25-22	25-23	25-15		TMVL Shield	5	-	10
13	26	Nov 03, 2024	3	-	2	22-25	25-22	25-23	16-25	15-12	Non-Conference	5	-	11
15	21	Jul 20, 2025	3	-	1	26-24	26-24	24-26	26-24		Non-Conference	6	-	11
15	33	Aug 03, 2025	0	- (n)	3	18-25	11-25	20-25			Holyoke Invitational15-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	6	-	12
16	12	Oct 05, 2025	0	-	3	19-25	18-25	15-25			William G. Morgan Cup16-12Round of 32 William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	13

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.