Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 14

Why Do I Care?

Tucson Spikin Saguaros

Amy Sellers

(H)
at San Jose

San Jose Shrimps

Vick Hall

San Jose leads series 18-6

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Tucson			San Jose
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
89.00	A-	Libero		B+	83.75
89.25	A-	Middle Blockers		A+	102.50
89.13	A-	Outside Hitters		A-	88.50
72.00	C+	Right Side		A+	102.75
85.50	B+	Setter		A-	87.25
		Skills Prediction

	24 MATCHES
6	WINS	18
6	HOME	10
0	AWAY	4
0	NEUTRAL	4

Tucson		San Jose
#13	ELO Rank	#5

1,531.84	ELO Rating	1,576.24 (+145)

0.0%	ELO Winning Chance	0.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.376 12th	ATTACK PCT	.384 10th
13.16 9th	KILLS PER SET	12.77 15th
.863 12th	SERVE PCT	.871 7th
1.56 17th	ACES PER SET	1.73 8th
.567 11th	ASSIST PCT	.576 8th
12.84 8th	ASSISTS PER SET	12.41 14th
3.34 30th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.73 4th
6.92 9th	DIGS PER SET	6.28 26th
.928 3rd	RECEIVE PCT	.913 21st
2.196 7th	PASSER RATING	2.152 18th

	TOP TWO
Reeves (OH) 227 Cisneros (OH) 210	KILLS	Scilacci (OH) 315 Stearn (MB) 197
Quinn (MB) .602 Cisneros (OH) .581	ATTACK PCT	Scilacci (OH) .592 Stearn (MB) .576
Burke (S) 843 Hewson (S) 328	ASSISTS	Leak (S) 948 Clemente (S) 361
Mancuso (L) 28 Cisneros (OH) 27	ACES	Stearn (MB) 52 Leak (S) 28
Quinn (MB) 47 Muagututia (MB) 46	BLOCKS	Stearn (MB) 75 Biscardi (MB) 74
Mancuso (L) 142 Cisneros (OH) 85	DIGS	Gomez (L) 94 Booth (OH) 83
Cisneros (OH) 2.45 Reeves (OH) 2.29	PASSER RTG	Muller (L) 2.46 Walker (L) 2.38

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
12.		Bart Mancuso Senior B+ 2.21 Passer Rating 2.18 Digs Per Set	6.60

#	TOP SETTERS	Rtg
6.	Kelly Leak Soph. B 12.64 Assists Per Set 1.92 Service Pts Per Set	8.01
7.	Will Burke Soph. B 12.77 Assists Per Set 2.09 Service Pts Per Set	7.99

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
8.		Jack Lombardo Senior A 2.43 Kills Per Set 0.93 Blocks Per Set	6.97

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
6.	Emmanuel Biscardi Junior A 1.07 Blocks Per Set 2.75 Kills Per Set	7.74
9.	Joshua Quinn Senior B+ 0.76 Blocks Per Set 3.02 Kills Per Set	7.49
13.	Bill Stearn Senior A 0.99 Blocks Per Set 2.59 Kills Per Set	7.34

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	7	Apr 23, 2022	0	-	3	19-25	23-25	20-25			Pac 8	0	-	1
5	29	Jun 04, 2022	0	-	3	22-25	13-25	16-25			Pac 8	1	-	1
5	37	Jun 11, 2022	3	- (n)	0	25-16	25-20	25-17			National Championship5-37Quarterfinals National Championship	1	-	2
6	7	Aug 13, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	14-25	20-25			Pac 8	1	-	3
6	23	Sep 10, 2022	2	-	3	19-25	22-25	25-18	25-18	9-15	Pac 8 Tournament6-23Semifinals Pac 8 Tournament	1	-	4
6	29	Sep 24, 2022	3	-	2	25-21	29-27	23-25	24-26	15-12	Pac 8	1	-	5
7	1	Nov 12, 2022	0	-	3	20-25	17-25	10-25			Pac 8	2	-	5
7	10	Dec 10, 2022	0	-	3	22-25	23-25	17-25			Pac 8	2	-	6
7	23	Dec 31, 2022	0	-	3	18-25	18-25	17-25			Pac 8 Tournament7-23Semifinals Pac 8 Tournament	3	-	6
8	4	Feb 26, 2023	0	-	3	24-26	14-25	14-25			Pac 8	3	-	7
8	13	Mar 19, 2023	0	-	3	12-25	18-25	13-25			Pac 8	4	-	7
8	32	Apr 16, 2023	2	- (n)	3	25-22	22-25	15-25	25-21	13-15	National Championship8-32Sweet 16 National Championship	4	-	8
9	14	Jun 25, 2023	3	-	0	25-17	25-21	25-19			Pac 8	4	-	9
9	44	Aug 13, 2023	1	-	3	25-21	16-25	18-25	14-25		Pac 8	4	-	10
10	5	Sep 17, 2023	0	-	3	12-25	14-25	16-25			Pac 8	4	-	11
10	39	Nov 19, 2023	3	-	1	18-25	25-20	31-29	25-22		Pac 8	4	-	12
10	45	Nov 26, 2023	0	- (n)	3	14-25	19-25	21-25			TMVL Cup	4	-	13
11	1	Dec 17, 2023	3	-	0	25-21	25-18	25-20			Pac 8	4	-	14
11	10	Jan 07, 2024	0	-	3	15-25	17-25	14-25			Pac 8	4	-	15
11	27	Feb 05, 2024	0	-	3	16-25	21-25	18-25			Pac 8 Tournament11-27CHAMPIONSHIP PAC 8 TOURNAMENT	4	-	16
12	7	May 12, 2024	1	-	3	20-25	25-13	23-25	22-25		Pac 8	5	-	16
12	29	Jun 23, 2024	1	-	3	23-25	18-25	27-25	16-25		Pac 8	5	-	17
12	32	Jun 23, 2024	3	- (n)	2	25-16	19-25	25-19	21-25	15-13	National Championship12-32Sweet 16 National Championship	5	-	18
13	14	Oct 13, 2024	0	-	3	16-25	14-25	13-25			Pac 8	6	-	18
13	44	Dec 01, 2024									Pac 8

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.