Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Non-Conference League Round 4

Why Do I Care?

Carlsbad Chameleons

Phil McIntosh

(H)
at Mendon

Mendon Mushrooms

Pierre van Rossum

Carlsbad leads series 11-8

Match Comments

It isn't an important game, but we play at home, so we need to do well.

Pierre (Mendon) Jan 26 - 6:47 AM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Carlsbad			Mendon
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
50.75	D-	Libero		A+	94.75
83.88	B+	Middle Blockers		A+	96.25
86.88	A-	Outside Hitters		A+	99.25
89.25	A-	Right Side		A+	98.75
88.50	A-	Setter		B	81.25
		Skills Prediction

	19 MATCHES
11	WINS	8
7	HOME	3
2	AWAY	2
2	NEUTRAL	3

Carlsbad		Mendon
#11	ELO Rank	#21

1,533.10	ELO Rating	1,477.45 (+145)

34.6%	ELO Winning Chance	65.4%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.388 9th	ATTACK PCT	.364 15th
13.18 10th	KILLS PER SET	13.46 6th
.855 25th	SERVE PCT	.864 14th
1.62 11th	ACES PER SET	1.75 6th
.562 12th	ASSIST PCT	.567 10th
12.59 15th	ASSISTS PER SET	13.19 4th
4.17 14th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.15 15th
6.74 8th	DIGS PER SET	6.46 20th
.904 30th	RECEIVE PCT	.930 1st
2.114 30th	PASSER RATING	2.214 4th

	TOP TWO
Morgan (OH) 280 Visser (MB) 204	KILLS	Forrester (OH) 279 Brickelmaier (OH) 233
Visser (MB) .507 Morgan (OH) .475	ATTACK PCT	Delgado (MB) .582 Brickelmaier (OH) .549
Fontaine (S) 931 Dunne (S) 445	ASSISTS	Strand (S) 910 Toniutti (S) 521
Fontaine (S) 46 Morgan (OH) 38	ACES	Brickelmaier (OH) 39 Riggins (RS) 33
Visser (MB) 86 Feliciano (MB) 71	BLOCKS	Delgado (MB) 67 Strand (S) 53
Morgan (OH) 114 Herrington (L) 88	DIGS	Riggins (L) 116 Tillie (L) 89
Timmerman (OH) 2.30 Morgan (OH) 2.25	PASSER RTG	Brickelmaier (OH) 2.45 Brower (OH) 2.29

#	TOP SETTERS	Rtg
3.	Austin Strand Soph. B- 13.00 Assists Per Set 1.54 Service Pts Per Set	8.14
7.	Dustin Fontaine Senior A- 12.41 Assists Per Set 2.12 Service Pts Per Set	7.96

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
2.		Jake Brickelmaier Senior A 3.82 Kills Per Set 2.45 Passer Rating	7.95

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
5.	Gus Delgado Senior A+ 1.03 Blocks Per Set 3.42 Kills Per Set	7.83
7.	Nick Visser Senior B+ 1.06 Blocks Per Set 2.52 Kills Per Set	7.63

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	8	Sep 05, 2020	0	-	3	17-25	13-25	20-25			Eastern Conference	0	-	1
1	25	Oct 10, 2020	3	-	0	25-23	27-25	25-20			Eastern Conference	0	-	2
1	28	Oct 10, 2020	1	-	3	26-24	13-25	22-25	17-25		Eastern Conference Tournament1-28Semifinals Eastern Conference Tournament	0	-	3
2	6	Jan 30, 2021	0	-	3	18-25	18-25	15-25			Eastern Conference	0	-	4
2	20	Feb 27, 2021	1	-	3	25-19	28-30	21-25	21-25		Eastern Conference	1	-	4
2	22	Feb 27, 2021	3	-	0	25-23	25-18	25-21			Eastern Conference Tournament2-22Quarterfinals Eastern Conference Tournament	1	-	5
2	23	Feb 27, 2021	2	-	3	19-25	25-23	25-23	21-25	12-15	William G. Morgan Cup2-23Quarterfinals William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	5
3	6	Aug 28, 2021	0	-	3	20-25	21-25	15-25			Eastern Conference	3	-	5
3	20	Sep 25, 2021	3	-	1	21-25	25-22	25-23	25-17		Eastern Conference	4	-	5
3	22	Sep 25, 2021	0	-	3	12-25	21-25	21-25			Eastern Conference Tournament3-22Quarterfinals Eastern Conference Tournament	5	-	5
3	27	Oct 02, 2021	0	-	3	13-25	22-25	23-25			William G. Morgan Cup3-27SEMIFINALS William G. Morgan Cup	6	-	5
4	6	Dec 04, 2021	1	-	3	15-25	25-22	14-25	17-25		Eastern Conference	7	-	5
4	16	Dec 25, 2021	3	-	2	25-19	15-25	25-21	16-25	18-16	Eastern Conference	8	-	5
4	35	Jan 22, 2022	1	- (n)	3	25-23	20-25	22-25	25-27		Holyoke Invitational4-35Quarterfinals Holyoke Invitational	9	-	5
5	33	Jun 04, 2022	1	- (n)	3	18-25	20-25	25-22	15-25		Holyoke Invitational5-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	10	-	5
8	21	Apr 02, 2023	2	-	3	25-23	26-24	21-25	21-25	11-15	Non-Conference	11	-	5
8	41	Apr 30, 2023	3	- (n)	2	17-25	25-23	20-25	25-22	15-13	TMVL Shield	11	-	6
10	36	Nov 12, 2023	3	- (n)	2	24-26	15-25	25-19	25-23	15-11	TMVL Shield	11	-	7
11	33	Feb 11, 2024	2	- (n)	3	25-22	21-25	21-25	25-18	10-15	Holyoke Invitational11-33Sweet 16 Holyoke Invitational	11	-	8
14	21	Jan 26, 2025	1	-	3	15-25	26-24	16-25	17-25		Non-Conference	11	-	9

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.