Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Non-Conference League Round 3

Why Do I Care?

Nashville Red Pandas

Roy Rolsten

(H)
at Denali

Denali Angry Wolves

Andy Shaw

Nashville leads series 10-7

Match Comments

Our rivals but both teams have more important games this session.

Andy (Denali) Mar 10 - 3:30 PM

Nothing is more important!

Roy (Nashville) Mar 12 - 9:49 PM

#3 v #4 ELO

Roy (Nashville) Mar 12 - 9:49 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Nashville			Denali
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
95.25	A+	Libero		B+	85.50
85.50	B+	Middle Blockers		A+	96.38
95.13	A+	Outside Hitters		A-	89.63
95.50	A+	Right Side		A-	89.25
80.75	B	Setter		A-	88.75
		Skills Prediction

	17 MATCHES
10	WINS	7
3	HOME	5
0	AWAY	2
7	NEUTRAL	0

Nashville		Denali
#13	ELO Rank	#14

1,544.41	ELO Rating	1,541.83 (+145)

25.3%	ELO Winning Chance	74.7%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.375 11th	ATTACK PCT	.422 4th
13.02 11th	KILLS PER SET	13.49 4th
.862 14th	SERVE PCT	.868 6th
1.87 2nd	ACES PER SET	1.48 19th
.564 12th	ASSIST PCT	.577 10th
12.68 11th	ASSISTS PER SET	13.02 6th
3.76 22nd	BLOCKS PER SET	4.56 6th
6.69 13th	DIGS PER SET	7.29 3rd
.935 1st	RECEIVE PCT	.913 26th
2.262 1st	PASSER RATING	2.127 26th

	TOP TWO
Plummer (RS) 235 Brown (OH) 204	KILLS	Suarez (OH) 188 Palma (OH) 183
Brown (OH) .562 Morris (OH) .528	ATTACK PCT	Suarez (OH) .636 Mesquita (MB) .561
Pereira (S) 766 Armstead (S) 262	ASSISTS	Savage (S) 567 van den Bergh (S) 513
Morris (OH) 28 Plummer (RS) 25	ACES	Suarez (OH) 22 Palma (OH) 14
Sanderson (MB) 56 Brown (OH) 45	BLOCKS	Dunne (MB) 53 Mesquita (MB) 46
Stoff (L) 137 Plummer (RS) 67	DIGS	Matthews (L) 93 Biggs (OH) 78
Kersten (L) 2.38 Stoff (L) 2.37	PASSER RTG	Suarez (OH) 2.34 Matthews (L) 2.27

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
5.	Logan Stoff Senior A- 2.37 Passer Rating 2.36 Digs Per Set	7.36
13.	Carlos Matthews Junior B- 2.27 Passer Rating 2.02 Digs Per Set	6.58

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
6.		Amir Suarez Senior A 3.69 Kills Per Set 2.34 Passer Rating	7.80

#	TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
9.	Erik Powell Senior A 0.88 Blocks Per Set 2.86 Kills Per Set	7.59
13.	Wayne Sanderson Soph. A- 0.90 Blocks Per Set 2.73 Kills Per Set	7.46

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
5	21	May 21, 2022	1	-	3	17-25	21-25	25-21	25-27		Non-Conference	0	-	1
6	17	Sep 03, 2022	0	-	3	17-25	18-25	17-25			Non-Conference	1	-	1
7	16	Dec 17, 2022	2	-	3	25-21	25-20	22-25	23-25	8-15	William G. Morgan Cup7-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	1	-	2
8	3	Feb 19, 2023	0	- (n)	3	23-25	17-25	17-25			William G. Morgan Cup8-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	2
8	18	Mar 26, 2023	0	-	3	19-25	9-25	19-25			Non-Conference	3	-	2
9	15	Jun 25, 2023	2	-	3	17-25	25-22	25-19	14-25	13-15	Non-Conference	4	-	2
9	16	Jun 25, 2023	0	-	3	20-25	18-25	21-25			William G. Morgan Cup9-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	3
9	22	Jul 09, 2023	0	- (n)	3	18-25	15-25	16-25			TMVL Cup9-22Round of 32 TMVL Cup	5	-	3
9	42	Aug 06, 2023	0	- (n)	3	23-25	16-25	22-25			National Championship9-42SEMIFINALS National Championship	6	-	3
11	18	Jan 22, 2024	3	-	2	25-23	25-18	23-25	21-25	15-13	Non-Conference	6	-	4
11	30	Feb 11, 2024	0	- (n)	3	17-25	12-25	19-25			TMVL Cup11-30Sweet 16 TMVL Cup	7	-	4
12	3	Apr 28, 2024	1	- (n)	3	25-21	22-25	23-25	20-25		William G. Morgan Cup12-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	8	-	4
12	15	May 27, 2024	2	-	3	23-25	25-15	25-20	18-25	10-15	Non-Conference	8	-	5
13	3	Sep 15, 2024	1	- (n)	3	25-23	19-25	22-25	23-25		William G. Morgan Cup13-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	9	-	5
14	20	Jan 21, 2025	2	-	3	25-23	23-25	25-23	22-25	7-15	William G. Morgan Cup14-20Quarterfinals William G. Morgan Cup	9	-	6
15	3	Jun 08, 2025	2	- (n)	3	25-15	26-28	25-21	19-25	7-15	William G. Morgan Cup15-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	6
16	15	Oct 12, 2025	3	-	1	25-16	22-25	25-21	25-22		Non-Conference	10	-	7
17	18	Mar 15, 2026	3	-	1	25-18	23-25	25-13	25-19		Non-Conference	11	-	7

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.