Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Non-Conference League Round 1

Why Do I Care?

Burlington Bullfrogs

Aires Martins Jr

(H)
at Quincy

Quincy Rabid Biting Mules

Allan Sellers

Burlington leads series 12-9

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Burlington			Quincy
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
79.50	B	Libero		B	80.00
89.00	A-	Middle Blockers		A+	97.25
82.75	B+	Outside Hitters		A+	96.88
74.00	B-	Right Side		A-	87.00
77.00	B-	Setter		B	80.25
		Skills Prediction

	21 MATCHES
12	WINS	9
3	HOME	2
5	AWAY	0
4	NEUTRAL	7

Burlington		Quincy
#17	ELO Rank	#39

1,529.06	ELO Rating	1,489.02 (+145)

0.0%	ELO Winning Chance	0.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.335 5th	ATTACK PCT	.094 30th
12.00 12th	KILLS PER SET	9.67 28th
.857 14th	SERVE PCT	.806 32nd
2.09 7th	ACES PER SET	.44 31st
.516 6th	ASSIST PCT	.362 30th
11.45 10th	ASSISTS PER SET	9 29th
4.27 16th	BLOCKS PER SET	1.89 32nd
8.82 11th	DIGS PER SET	7.56 24th
.927 9th	RECEIVE PCT	.931 7th
2.190 5th	PASSER RATING	2.180 8th

	TOP TWO
Weigand (OH) 23 Holt (RS) 20	KILLS	Ziegler (MB) 23 Hammond (RS) 23
Santos (MB) .800 Douglas (MB) .688	ATTACK PCT	Ziegler (MB) .474 Godfrey (S) .250
Ramos (S) 67 Loup (S) 48	ASSISTS	Godfrey (S) 71 Napolitano (L) 9
Santos (MB) 8 Blackburn (RS) 3	ACES	Ziegler (MB) 2 Gonçalves (OH) 1
Santos (MB) 11 Weigand (OH) 7	BLOCKS	Godfrey (S) 5 Ziegler (MB) 4
Steinbach (L) 17 van der Horst (L) 14	DIGS	Napolitano (L) 28 Hammond (RS) 11
Weigand (OH) 2.50 Steinbach (L) 2.39	PASSER RTG	Napolitano (L) 2.30 Dollophammer (OH) 2.17

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
11.	Mimmo Napolitano Junior C 2.30 Passer Rating 3.11 Digs Per Set	7.89
15.	Felix van der Horst Senior B 2.34 Passer Rating 2.33 Digs Per Set	7.36

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
10.		Arturo Ramos Soph. B- 11.17 Assists Per Set 3.33 Service Pts Per Set	7.42

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
4.		Karsten Weigand Senior B+ 3.83 Kills Per Set 2.50 Passer Rating	8.58

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
7.		Juan Santos Senior A 1.83 Blocks Per Set 2.17 Kills Per Set	8.58

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	17	Sep 26, 2020	2	-	3	19-25	23-25	32-30	25-23	13-15	Non-Conference	1	-	0
1	31	Oct 17, 2020	0	- (n)	3	16-25	16-26	24-26			TMVL Grand Championship1-31Group Round TMVL Grand Championship	1	-	1
2	29	Mar 13, 2021	1	-	3	13-25	27-25	20-25	18-25		Non-Conference	2	-	1
3	29	Oct 09, 2021	1	-	3	19-25	20-25	25-23	19-25		Non-Conference	2	-	2
3	34	Oct 16, 2021	2	- (n)	3	25-23	25-21	17-25	24-26	12-15	National Championship3-34Quarterfinals National Championship	2	-	3
3	43	Oct 30, 2021	3	- (n)	2	19-25	30-32	25-22	25-21	15-10	TMVL Shield	3	-	3
4	29	Jan 15, 2022	3	-	2	15-25	26-24	25-18	20-25	15-8	Non-Conference	4	-	3
5	21	May 21, 2022	1	-	3	21-25	25-19	22-25	20-25		Non-Conference	4	-	4
6	42	Oct 08, 2022	0	- (n)	3	17-25	13-25	18-25			National Championship6-42SEMIFINALS National Championship	4	-	5
7	15	Dec 17, 2022	3	-	0	25-20	27-25	27-25			Non-Conference	5	-	5
8	31	Apr 16, 2023	1	- (n)	3	25-20	17-25	17-25	17-25		TMVL Shield8-31Sweet 16 TMVL Shield	6	-	5
9	15	Jun 25, 2023	3	-	1	25-23	25-21	16-25	25-18		Non-Conference	7	-	5
11	15	Jan 14, 2024	3	-	2	25-18	19-25	25-22	23-25	15-11	Non-Conference	8	-	5
11	45	Mar 03, 2024	3	- (n)	1	20-25	25-21	25-20	25-23		TMVL Cup	8	-	6
12	31	Jun 23, 2024	3	- (n)	0	25-19	25-19	25-23			TMVL Shield12-31Sweet 16 TMVL Shield	9	-	6
13	15	Oct 13, 2024	2	-	3	21-25	25-22	20-25	28-26	12-15	Non-Conference	10	-	6
13	46	Dec 01, 2024	1	- (n)	3	25-23	13-25	17-25	18-25		TMVL Shield	10	-	7
15	3	Jun 08, 2025	3	- (n)	1	25-19	25-15	21-25	25-22		William G. Morgan Cup15-3Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	10	-	8
17	15	Mar 08, 2026	3	-	2	24-26	25-22	23-25	27-25	15-10	Non-Conference	11	-	8
17	32	Apr 05, 2026	0	- (n)	3	23-25	31-33	24-26			National Championship17-32Sweet 16 National Championship	11	-	9
17	40	Apr 19, 2026	2	- (n)	3	29-27	20-25	22-25	26-24	11-15	TMVL Cup	12	-	9
18	15	Aug 30, 2026									Non-Conference

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.