Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

Conference League Round 9

Why Do I Care?

Santa Clara Chihuahuas

Martyn Hathaway

(H)
at San Diego

San Diego Swordfish

Matt White

Santa Clara leads series 15-12

Match Comments

After a lose at home last time out will want to get that win this time

Matt (San Diego) Jan 12 - 1:32 PM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Santa Clara			San Diego
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
88.00	A-	Libero		A	90.75
77.25	B-	Middle Blockers		A	90.38
75.25	B-	Outside Hitters		B	79.50
80.75	B	Right Side		B	78.00
74.50	B-	Setter		B	79.75
		Skills Prediction

	27 MATCHES
15	WINS	12
10	HOME	8
2	AWAY	3
3	NEUTRAL	1

Santa Clara		San Diego
#31	ELO Rank	#27

1,325.55	ELO Rating	1,410.14 (+145)

34.5%	ELO Winning Chance	65.5%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.243 32nd	ATTACK PCT	.316 27th
11.57 31st	KILLS PER SET	12.31 28th
.837 32nd	SERVE PCT	.857 24th
1.23 30th	ACES PER SET	1.52 18th
.469 31st	ASSIST PCT	.514 28th
11.3 31st	ASSISTS PER SET	11.9 28th
3.78 24th	BLOCKS PER SET	4.12 16th
7.25 1st	DIGS PER SET	6.56 16th
.918 17th	RECEIVE PCT	.930 2nd
2.172 14th	PASSER RATING	2.169 15th

	TOP TWO
Rojas (RS) 319 Schumann (MB) 226	KILLS	Grimes (OH) 399 Durr (OH) 270
Schumann (MB) .461 Rojas (RS) .370	ATTACK PCT	Souza (RS) .500 Nicodemo (MB) .477
Meyer (S) 946 Sheridan (S) 290	ASSISTS	Zuma (S) 997 Calderon (S) 281
Halversen (L) 22 Rojas (RS) 20	ACES	Nicodemo (MB) 43 Mackinnon (L) 38
Schumann (MB) 81 Green (MB) 61	BLOCKS	Nicodemo (MB) 81 Buglioni (MB) 79
Halversen (L) 151 Alvarez (L) 121	DIGS	Mackinnon (L) 192 Durr (OH) 97
Alvarez (L) 2.35 Halversen (L) 2.26	PASSER RTG	Mackinnon (L) 2.33 Reese (L) 2.25

#	TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
10.	Ky Mackinnon Junior A- 2.33 Passer Rating 2.04 Digs Per Set	6.91
13.	Cesar Alvarez Soph. A- 2.35 Passer Rating 1.86 Digs Per Set	6.40

#		TOP RIGHT SIDES	Rtg
7.		Dani Rojas Junior B 3.54 Kills Per Set 0.58 Blocks Per Set	7.29

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	16	Sep 19, 2020	2	-	3	25-23	20-25	21-25	25-18	15-17	Non-Conference	1	-	0
1	29	Oct 17, 2020	1	- (n)	3	16-25	15-25	25-19	17-25		TMVL Grand Championship1-29Group Round TMVL Grand Championship	2	-	0
2	32	Mar 20, 2021	1	-	3	21-25	25-19	19-25	11-25		Non-Conference	2	-	1
3	10	Sep 04, 2021	2	- (n)	3	25-22	30-28	21-25	22-25	8-15	William G. Morgan Cup3-10Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	1
3	32	Oct 16, 2021	3	-	0	25-13	25-23	25-15			Non-Conference	3	-	2
4	18	Dec 25, 2021	0	-	3	21-25	21-25	20-25			Non-Conference	4	-	2
5	7	Apr 23, 2022	0	-	3	15-25	23-25	14-25			Pac 8	5	-	2
5	29	Jun 04, 2022	3	-	0	25-19	25-20	30-28			Pac 8	6	-	2
6	1	Jul 31, 2022	2	-	3	12-25	25-23	14-25	32-30	9-15	Pac 8	7	-	2
6	10	Aug 20, 2022	1	-	3	25-22	23-25	23-25	17-25		Pac 8	7	-	3
7	1	Nov 12, 2022	0	-	3	12-25	22-25	18-25			Pac 8	7	-	4
7	10	Dec 10, 2022	0	-	3	13-25	15-25	22-25			Pac 8	8	-	4
7	22	Dec 31, 2022	3	- (n)	1	25-23	25-23	23-25	25-21		TMVL Cup7-22Round of 32 TMVL Cup	9	-	4
8	2	Feb 19, 2023	3	-	1	28-26	18-25	25-21	25-20		Pac 8	10	-	4
8	11	Mar 12, 2023	3	-	1	25-23	25-19	25-27	25-11		Pac 8	10	-	5
9	8	Jun 11, 2023	0	-	3	13-25	20-25	10-25			Pac 8	10	-	6
9	34	Jul 30, 2023	3	-	1	25-20	22-25	25-23	25-16		Pac 8	10	-	7
10	5	Sep 17, 2023	1	-	3	25-21	23-25	23-25	18-25		Pac 8	11	-	7
10	39	Nov 19, 2023	0	-	3	19-25	18-25	23-25			Pac 8	11	-	8
11	2	Dec 17, 2023	0	-	3	12-25	23-25	25-27			Pac 8	11	-	9
11	11	Jan 07, 2024	1	-	3	21-25	23-25	25-17	15-25		Pac 8	12	-	9
12	14	May 27, 2024	0	-	3	8-25	11-25	15-25			Pac 8	12	-	10
12	44	Jul 14, 2024	0	-	3	20-25	22-25	13-25			Pac 8	13	-	10
13	4	Sep 22, 2024	0	-	3	12-25	22-25	20-25			Pac 8	13	-	11
13	13	Oct 13, 2024	0	-	3	24-26	18-25	25-27			Pac 8	14	-	11
13	45	Dec 01, 2024	3	- (n)	2	22-25	25-23	25-18	21-25	15-10	TMVL Cup	14	-	12
14	4	Dec 22, 2024	2	-	3	25-22	25-23	21-25	17-25	5-15	Pac 8	15	-	12
14	13	Jan 12, 2025	0	-	3	7-25	15-25	16-25			Pac 8	15	-	13

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.