Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (3)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Carlsbad Chameleons

Phil McIntosh

(N)
Neutral Court

Quincy Rabid Biting Mules

Allan Sellers

Quincy leads series 21-3

Match Comments

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Carlsbad			Quincy
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
57.25	D	Libero		B-	77.75
79.75	B	Middle Blockers		A	92.50
83.00	B+	Outside Hitters		A	93.38
75.75	B-	Right Side		B+	82.25
80.25	B	Setter		B	78.50
		Skills Prediction

	24 MATCHES
3	WINS	21
0	HOME	8
1	AWAY	7
2	NEUTRAL	6

Carlsbad		Quincy
#55	ELO Rank	#39

1,462.59	ELO Rating	1,489.02

0.0%	ELO Winning Chance	0.0%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.240 19th	ATTACK PCT	.094 30th
11.00 20th	KILLS PER SET	9.67 28th
.807 31st	SERVE PCT	.806 32nd
1.5 19th	ACES PER SET	.44 31st
.449 18th	ASSIST PCT	.362 30th
10.9 18th	ASSISTS PER SET	9 28th
3.7 24th	BLOCKS PER SET	1.89 32nd
7.2 28th	DIGS PER SET	7.56 24th
.916 13th	RECEIVE PCT	.931 7th
2.111 19th	PASSER RATING	2.180 8th

	TOP TWO
Quinn (OH) 24 Riggs (OH) 16	KILLS	Hammond (RS) 23 Ziegler (MB) 23
Gogolak (MB) .647 Bormann (S) .500	ATTACK PCT	Ziegler (MB) .474 Godfrey (S) .250
Bormann (S) 71 Polanco (S) 30	ASSISTS	Godfrey (S) 71 Napolitano (L) 9
Gogolak (MB) 4 Riggs (OH) 2	ACES	Ziegler (MB) 2 Godfrey (S) 1
Landauer (MB) 6 Torre (RS) 5	BLOCKS	Godfrey (S) 5 Ziegler (MB) 4
May (L) 12 Troy (OH) 11	DIGS	Napolitano (L) 28 Hammond (RS) 11
Troy (OH) 2.32 May (L) 2.25	PASSER RTG	Napolitano (L) 2.30 Dollophammer (OH) 2.17

#		TOP LIBEROS	Rtg
11.		Mimmo Napolitano Junior C 2.30 Passer Rating 3.11 Digs Per Set	7.89

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
1	11	Sep 12, 2020	3	-	2	25-23	22-25	25-20	19-25	15-9	Eastern Conference	0	-	1
1	26	Oct 10, 2020	2	-	3	25-18	25-22	20-25	16-25	16-18	Eastern Conference	0	-	2
1	32	Oct 17, 2020	3	-	1	25-19	24-26	25-20	26-24		William G. Morgan Cup1-32SEMIFINALS William G. Morgan Cup	0	-	3
2	1	Jan 23, 2021	3	-	2	25-23	25-18	28-30	19-25	15-13	Eastern Conference	0	-	4
2	12	Feb 13, 2021	0	-	3	18-25	15-25	11-25			Eastern Conference	0	-	5
3	1	Aug 21, 2021	0	-	3	18-25	18-25	21-25			Eastern Conference	0	-	6
3	3	Aug 21, 2021	3	- (n)	2	21-25	17-25	25-13	25-17	15-11	TMVL Cup3-3Sweet 16 TMVL Cup	1	-	6
3	10	Sep 04, 2021	3	- (n)	2	25-17	18-25	25-18	21-25	15-10	William G. Morgan Cup3-10Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	2	-	6
3	12	Sep 11, 2021	3	-	1	25-21	21-25	25-15	25-23		Eastern Conference	2	-	7
3	26	Oct 02, 2021	2	-	3	18-25	26-24	25-19	12-25	12-15	Eastern Conference Tournament3-26Semifinals Eastern Conference Tournament	2	-	8
3	39	Oct 23, 2021	0	- (n)	3	23-25	24-26	16-25			National Championship3-39SEMIFINALS National Championship	2	-	9
4	2	Nov 27, 2021	3	-	2	25-21	23-25	25-22	14-25	15-12	Eastern Conference	2	-	10
4	12	Dec 18, 2021	0	-	3	10-25	14-25	15-25			Eastern Conference	2	-	11
4	26	Jan 08, 2022	0	-	3	18-25	19-25	18-25			Eastern Conference Tournament4-26Semifinals Eastern Conference Tournament	2	-	12
4	31	Jan 15, 2022	0	-	3	22-25	33-35	18-25			William G. Morgan Cup4-31CHAMPIONSHIP WILLIAM G. MORGAN CUP	2	-	13
5	22	May 21, 2022	2	- (n)	3	22-25	18-25	25-23	25-22	12-15	TMVL Cup5-22Round of 32 TMVL Cup	2	-	14
5	25	May 28, 2022	0	-	3	23-25	16-25	23-25			Non-Conference	2	-	15
7	25	Jan 07, 2023	3	-	1	18-25	25-20	25-20	25-19		Non-Conference	2	-	16
9	16	Jun 25, 2023	3	-	1	25-18	20-25	25-21	25-19		William G. Morgan Cup9-16Sweet 16 William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	16
10	9	Sep 24, 2023	1	- (n)	3	20-25	29-31	25-17	20-25		William G. Morgan Cup10-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	17
11	35	Feb 18, 2024	3	- (n)	1	25-21	24-26	25-18	25-20		TMVL Cup	3	-	18
12	25	Jun 17, 2024	3	-	0	25-18	25-16	25-15			Non-Conference	3	-	19
13	31	Nov 10, 2024	1	- (n)	3	23-25	25-23	15-25	23-25		TMVL Shield13-31Sweet 16 TMVL Shield	3	-	20
14	9	Dec 29, 2024	0	- (n)	3	23-25	21-25	21-25			William G. Morgan Cup14-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	21
18	9	Aug 16, 2026									William G. Morgan Cup18-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.