Match Report

TEAM MATCHUP

WGM Cup Group (3)

Competition Info | Bracket Link | Why Do I Care?

Nashville Red Pandas

Roy Rolsten

(N)
Neutral Court

Schenectady Squirrels

Brian Beerman

Nashville leads series 4-1

Match Comments

Both teams can still advance, or not. Roy's pandas look stronger, but we're not going to run to the trees in this one. We're all in here. Or are we?

Brian (Schenectady) Jun 17 - 4:20 PM

Trees!

Roy (Nashville) Jun 21 - 12:01 AM

Match Preview

Matchup and Prediction

Nashville			Schenectady
T7-Ovr	T7-Gr	Position		T7-Gr	T7-Ovr
79.25	B	Libero		B+	82.00
95.50	A+	Middle Blockers		B+	82.50
85.13	B+	Outside Hitters		B+	85.38
85.00	B+	Right Side		C	69.75
82.75	B+	Setter		B	80.00
		Skills Prediction

	5 MATCHES
4	WINS	1
1	HOME	0
0	AWAY	0
3	NEUTRAL	1

Nashville		Schenectady
#6	ELO Rank	#22

1,552.14	ELO Rating	1,476.87

56.1%	ELO Winning Chance	43.9%
	ELO Prediction

	TEAM STATS
.333 16th	ATTACK PCT	.279 26th
12.27 16th	KILLS PER SET	11.48 28th
.88 2nd	SERVE PCT	.852 21st
1.95 4th	ACES PER SET	1.31 28th
.538 13th	ASSIST PCT	.483 29th
11.95 15th	ASSISTS PER SET	11.19 27th
5.5 2nd	BLOCKS PER SET	4.38 14th
6.84 20th	DIGS PER SET	6.96 17th
.915 14th	RECEIVE PCT	.909 19th
2.126 22nd	PASSER RATING	2.177 10th

	TOP TWO
Garrity (OH) 111 McAdoo (MB) 101	KILLS	Clarke (OH) 142 Contreras (OH) 86
McAdoo (MB) .705 Garrity (OH) .488	ATTACK PCT	Clarke (OH) .518 Morgan (MB) .448
Cutter (S) 395 Pereira (S) 88	ASSISTS	Munson (S) 306 Marshal (S) 138
Garrity (OH) 21 Plummer (RS) 11	ACES	Contreras (OH) 12 Capdevila (RS) 10
McAdoo (MB) 47 Howard (MB) 35	BLOCKS	Obelix (MB) 29 Clarke (OH) 28
Stoff (L) 56 Morris (OH) 41	DIGS	Beerman (L) 64 Capdevila (RS) 48
Garrity (OH) 2.44 Morris (OH) 2.10	PASSER RTG	Clarke (OH) 2.35 Beerman (L) 2.24

#		TOP SETTERS	Rtg
7.		Jake Cutter Junior B- 12.74 Assists Per Set 1.71 Service Pts Per Set	8.02

#		TOP OUTSIDE HITTERS	Rtg
6.		Buddy Garrity Senior A- 3.58 Kills Per Set 2.44 Passer Rating	8.15

#		TOP MIDDLE BLOCKERS	Rtg
1.		Isaac McAdoo Senior A+ 1.52 Blocks Per Set 3.26 Kills Per Set	8.92

Head to head results

S	M	DATE			HOME	1	2	3	4	5	COMPETITION		-
6	45	Oct 15, 2022	3	- (n)	2	18-25	25-23	24-26	25-12	15-8	TMVL Cup	1	-	0
8	9	Mar 05, 2023	2	- (n)	3	25-20	25-19	22-25	25-27	12-15	William G. Morgan Cup8-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	1	-	1
10	25	Oct 29, 2023	0	-	3	29-31	22-25	25-27			Non-Conference	2	-	1
11	9	Dec 31, 2023	3	- (n)	1	14-25	25-23	25-19	25-21		William G. Morgan Cup11-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	3	-	1
12	45	Jul 14, 2024	1	- (n)	3	15-25	25-23	19-25	19-25		TMVL Cup	4	-	1
15	9	Jun 22, 2025	1	- (n)	3	13-25	19-25	25-20	18-25		William G. Morgan Cup15-9Group Round William G. Morgan Cup	4	-	2

Notes
This shows a preview based on your Top 7 players. Your top 7 players (and your opponents) may not be playing. The effective overall and effective grades INCLUDE BOTH FIT and HOME COURT additions.

This is a basic prediction and does not mean you will win if you get the prediction checkmark. In fact, you will likely lose. This is a simple totaling of the checkmarks where we double the count for OH and MB since you have two of those on the floor versus the other positions.

We are interested in adding to this concept though like using a Top-14 where we double the weight for the starter but add the numbers for the backups as they will play in a session too. Thoughts or ideas?

ELO
For ELO, 145 Rating points are added to the home team's ELO rating to determine the chance of winning.