Players

Lucas Lundstrom 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	13	16	11	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	15	.800	7	1	4	0.33	14	.714	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.96
7	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	26	.500	10	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.71
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	19	.316	9	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.93
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	24	.417	6	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.14
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	26	.462	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	1	0.20	2	.500	17.0	6.06
14	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	24	4.80	8	40	.400	8	1	1	0.20	18	.944	.	.	.	.	26.5	8.15
15	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	3	28	.536	6	3	6	0.75	15	.600	.	.	.	.	25.0	8.35
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	2	33	.606	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	23.0	6.73
18	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	15	.267	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.24
21	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	4	30	.500	6	2	1	0.40	20	.950	.	.	.	.	23.0	7.93
22	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	18	.389	4	0	2	0.00	15	.867	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.5	6.57
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	15	.600	0	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.41
26	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	6	28	.321	5	0	4	0.00	16	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	7.75
29	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	23	.435	2	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.43
32	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	14	.643	11	3	4	1.00	19	.789	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.00
36	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	25	.640	7	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.31
41	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	23	.304	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.5	6.55
Total		68	245	3.60	55	402	.473	94	18	37	0.26	248	.851	3	0.04	6	.500	292.5	7.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	6	2.44	9	0	1.000	15.0	8.96
7	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	14	2.04	27	2	.926	22.0	7.71
8	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	13	2.45	20	1	.950	12.5	5.93
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	5	2.06	17	0	1.000	16.5	8.14
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	14	2.09	32	3	.906	17.0	6.06
14	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	12	2.21	29	1	.966	26.5	8.15
15	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	1	2.00	4	1.00	9	2.15	20	0	1.000	25.0	8.35
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	18	1.91	47	6	.872	23.0	6.73
18	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	2.42	19	0	1.000	7.5	5.24
21	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	15	2.38	24	0	1.000	23.0	7.93
22	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	17	2.28	32	1	.969	13.5	6.57
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	7	2.75	8	0	1.000	11.5	7.41
26	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	7	1.40	17	2.54	24	1	.958	18.5	7.75
29	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	23	2.32	37	2	.946	13.0	4.43
32	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	10	1.88	26	4	.846	13.0	6.00
36	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	10	1.82	22	5	.773	22.5	7.31
41	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	5	1.92	13	1	.923	12.5	6.55
Total		68	0	59	59	3	0.87	48	0.71	205	2.18	406	27	.933	292.5	7.01