Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	6.33
5	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	5.88
7	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	6	.000	0.0	5.50
11	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	2	2	0.67	7	.714	2	0.67	3	.667	2.0	6.00
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	1	0.67	17	.941	2	0.67	5	.400	2.0	4.67
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	13	.923	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	3.88
31	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	4	0.20	11	.636	1	0.20	12	.083	1.0	5.75
Total		23	.	.	.	.	.	21	7	9	0.30	58	.845	11	0.48	40	.275	7.0	5.43

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.11	18	2	.889	0.0	6.33
5	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	1.94	17	1	.941	1.0	5.88
7	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	2.17	12	1	.917	0.0	5.50
11	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	17	2.09	33	5	.848	2.0	6.00
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	1.54	28	6	.786	2.0	4.67
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.00	21	2	.905	1.0	3.88
31	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	9	2.29	17	1	.941	1.0	5.75
Total		23	.	.	.	.	.	50	2.17	59	1.99	146	18	.877	7.0	5.43