Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	20	6.67	76	.263	1.0	2.54
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	5	0	4	0.00	13	.692	25	8.33	64	.391	0.0	3.20
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	4	0.00	7	.429	22	7.33	62	.355	1.0	2.55
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	2	1	3	0.33	9	.667	13	4.33	68	.191	1.5	1.94
14	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	6	.500	4	1	4	0.25	13	.692	34	8.50	108	.315	7.0	5.70
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	30	10.00	76	.395	1.0	5.04
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	6	2	2	0.67	15	.867	38	12.67	84	.452	5.5	8.34
29	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	5	3	6	0.75	16	.625	43	10.75	93	.462	3.5	5.36
Total		26	7	0.27	2	19	.263	31	8	26	0.31	97	.732	225	8.65	631	.357	20.5	4.33

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.54
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.20
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.55
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	1.94
14	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.70
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.04
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.34
29	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.36
Total		26	1	9	10	2	0.38	25	0.96	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	4.33