Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	47	.064	8	1	4	0.20	18	.778	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.90
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	7	1	4	0.33	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.37
10	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	19	.105	6	2	2	0.67	13	.846	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.12
11	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	16	.188	5	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.39
13	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	21	.095	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.34
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	9	.000	7	2	3	0.67	13	.769	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.37
18	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	11	.091	11	2	3	0.50	19	.842	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.10
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	9	.222	5	1	4	0.25	14	.714	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.28
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	12	.333	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.13
24	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	13	.231	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.92
25	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	21	.524	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.49
28	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	18	.389	13	1	4	0.20	24	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.74
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	34	.353	9	2	2	0.40	19	.895	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.03
32	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	23	.304	9	0	4	0.00	19	.789	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.14
36	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	18	.444	8	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.42
Total		60	112	1.87	44	280	.243	109	18	43	0.30	236	.818	.	.	.	.	153.0	6.38

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	0	1.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.90
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.37
10	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.12
11	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.39
13	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.34
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.37
18	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.10
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.28
22	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.13
24	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.92
25	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.49
28	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.74
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	9.03
32	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.14
36	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.42
Total		60	4	38	42	5	0.70	59	0.98	.	.	.	.	.	153.0	6.38