Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	3	1.00	10	.300	0.0	7.30
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	7.68
4	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	10.00
6	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	5	0.25	16	.688	4	1.00	11	.364	1.0	7.36
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	8.58
9	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.40	15	.933	3	0.60	6	.500	2.0	6.00
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	4.30
12	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	2	0.50	13	.154	0.0	7.88
13	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	4.35
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	6.53
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	8.04
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	3.65
36	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	13	.154	0.0	6.10
38	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	6.33
39	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.25	10	.900	1	0.25	10	.100	1.0	6.08
41	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	1	0.33	6	.167	1.0	7.16
46	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	5.75
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	41	5	20	0.08	126	.841	32	0.54	114	.281	5.0	6.65

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	6	2.00	10	2	.800	0.0	7.30
3	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	18	6.00	8	2.06	17	2	.882	0.0	7.68
4	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	13	2.65	17	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
6	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	12	2.04	24	4	.833	1.0	7.36
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	9	2.09	22	1	.955	0.0	8.58
9	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	17	2.15	34	4	.882	2.0	6.00
10	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	1.86	22	5	.773	0.0	4.30
12	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	17	2.32	28	1	.964	0.0	7.88
13	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	17	2.00	42	5	.881	0.0	4.35
14	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	9	1.79	24	4	.833	0.0	6.53
17	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.35	20	1	.950	0.0	8.04
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	1.64	25	7	.720	0.0	3.65
36	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	11	2.32	22	1	.955	0.0	6.10
38	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.21	28	0	1.000	0.0	6.33
39	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	14	1.91	34	4	.882	1.0	6.08
41	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	16	2.31	32	0	1.000	1.0	7.16
46	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.24	21	2	.905	0.0	5.75
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	172	2.92	206	2.10	422	43	.898	5.0	6.65