Players

Kyle Goodman Sophomore Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	14	14	14	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	8	27	-.037	3	2	2	0.50	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.64
2	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	9	19	-.316	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	2.82
4	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	27	.222	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.64
6	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	14	.357	9	1	3	0.33	16	.813	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.36
7	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	10	.500	3	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.57
9	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	10	.200	11	1	2	0.25	18	.889	0	0.00	2	.000	7.0	3.94
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	8	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.86
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	15	.667	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	5.86
14	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	27	.370	5	1	4	0.25	14	.714	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.78
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	26	.308	4	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.96
17	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	11	25	-.120	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.93
18	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	9	36	.083	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.0	6.20
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	4	28	.464	11	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.17
23	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	16	.438	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.24
25	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	18	.556	5	2	1	0.40	15	.933	1	0.20	2	.500	16.0	5.13
26	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	9	35	.057	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.94
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	16	.250	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.88
39	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	11	.091	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.04
44	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	24	.167	3	2	1	0.40	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	3.67
Total		73	165	2.26	82	391	.212	85	13	34	0.18	233	.854	2	0.03	8	.250	202.0	5.24

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	14	2.07	29	4	.862	10.0	3.64
2	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	14	1.94	33	4	.879	5.0	2.82
4	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	16	2.18	33	2	.939	9.5	4.64
6	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	2.09	22	2	.909	8.5	5.36
7	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	6	2.18	11	1	.909	7.0	4.57
9	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	10	2.00	19	4	.789	7.0	3.94
10	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	10	2.38	16	2	.875	5.0	4.86
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	.	.	12	2.26	23	2	.913	14.5	5.86
14	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	13	2.06	31	3	.903	15.5	6.78
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	4	2.00	14	0	1.000	16.5	7.96
17	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	8.5	5.93
18	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	7	1.40	18	2.82	22	0	1.000	13.0	6.20
21	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	8	2.42	12	0	1.000	18.0	9.17
23	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	20	2.23	35	2	.943	10.5	5.24
25	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	17	2.15	34	4	.882	16.0	5.13
26	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	23	2.36	36	2	.944	12.5	4.94
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	12	2.37	19	1	.947	7.5	4.88
39	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	13	2.32	22	1	.955	6.0	4.04
44	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	17	2.19	26	4	.846	11.5	3.67
Total		73	2	44	46	2	0.63	69	0.95	248	2.22	455	38	.916	202.0	5.24