Players

Dale Wicks Junior Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	15	-	-	17	13

Season 17 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
207 3rd	2.22 74th	.935 67th	93 73rd	21 107th

Career Honors

S171st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 17)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.25	10	.900	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	5.50
6	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.20	13	.769	4	0.80	6	.667	1.0	8.08
7	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	6.18
9	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	5	0.20	18	.722	7	1.40	9	.778	1.0	6.30
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	1	0.67	12	.917	3	1.00	7	.429	2.0	6.30
12	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.25	10	.800	4	1.00	8	.500	1.0	8.48
14	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	3.65
15	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	5.70
17	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	1	0.25	17	.941	1	0.25	5	.200	1.0	5.60
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	4	0.00	12	.667	8	2.67	9	.889	0.0	10.00
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	6.78
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3	2	0.75	21	.905	7	1.75	10	.700	3.0	6.05
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.25	18	.889	7	1.75	8	.875	1.0	7.34
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.67	8	.875	4	1.33	6	.667	2.0	8.29
31	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	6.23
33	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.20	14	.929	7	1.40	10	.700	1.0	4.58
36	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	5.95
38	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	9.53
39	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	0	0.60	17	1.000	2	0.40	3	.667	3.0	6.43
43	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.20	14	.929	7	1.40	10	.700	1.0	5.30
44	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	6	2.00	8	.750	0.0	7.52
46	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	1	0.20	2	.500	0.0	7.25
48	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	9.24
Total		90	.	.	.	.	.	112	21	33	0.23	284	.884	93	1.03	142	.655	21.0	6.79

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 17)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	2.00	28	2	.929	1.0	5.50
6	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	24	4.80	13	1.97	32	5	.844	1.0	8.08
7	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.18	17	1	.941	1.0	6.18
9	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	12	2.12	26	2	.923	1.0	6.30
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	5	2.29	7	1	.857	2.0	6.30
12	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	18	2.54	28	0	1.000	1.0	8.48
14	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	14	2.14	29	2	.931	0.0	3.65
15	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	19	2.22	36	2	.944	0.0	5.70
17	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	1.90	31	4	.871	1.0	5.60
18	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.00	17	2	.882	0.0	6.78
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.00	32	2	.938	3.0	6.05
25	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	17	2.37	27	1	.963	1.0	7.34
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.44	18	0	1.000	2.0	8.29
31	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.18	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.23
33	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	19	2.34	32	2	.938	1.0	4.58
36	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.10	29	4	.862	1.0	5.95
38	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	0.0	9.53
39	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	18	2.19	36	2	.944	3.0	6.43
43	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	15	2.22	27	3	.889	1.0	5.30
44	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.12	17	1	.941	0.0	7.52
46	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	19	2.43	30	1	.967	0.0	7.25
48	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	15	2.57	23	0	1.000	1.0	9.24
Total		90	.	.	.	.	.	207	2.30	302	2.22	573	37	.935	21.0	6.79