Players

Gabriel Orozco Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	15	15	12	10

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	18	.111	3	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.10
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	22	.182	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.16
4	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	20	.350	10	2	0	0.50	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.31
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	12	.167	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	2	.500	6.0	2.59
7	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	4	17	-.059	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	1	0.25	1	1.000	6.5	4.03
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	17	.118	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.94
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	14	.429	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	2.33
12	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	13	.077	1	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.95
14	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	13	.231	12	1	1	0.33	17	.941	2	0.67	3	.667	6.0	5.63
15	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	16	.125	6	1	2	0.20	17	.882	0	0.00	2	.000	9.0	4.03
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	14	.000	1	1	3	0.33	7	.571	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.25
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	20	.450	5	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.64
21	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	5	13	-.308	4	2	0	0.50	12	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	5.0	4.01
26	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	11	.182	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	5.58
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	14	30	-.200	3	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.32
33	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	7	21	.048	7	1	5	0.20	20	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	3.29
36	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	27	.222	10	2	2	0.40	21	.905	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.66
41	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	15	.267	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.55
46	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	18	.444	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	7.27
Total		66	121	1.83	73	331	.145	83	14	29	0.21	227	.872	6	0.09	13	.462	159.5	4.45

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	5	1.72	18	2	.889	6.0	3.10
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	13	2.22	23	1	.957	7.0	4.16
4	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	9	2.16	19	1	.947	13.0	6.31
6	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	10	1.65	26	6	.769	6.0	2.59
7	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	4	1.00	13	2.03	31	4	.871	6.5	4.03
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	1.86	28	3	.893	7.5	2.94
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	7	1.65	23	6	.739	6.5	2.33
12	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	2.08	24	0	1.000	6.5	2.95
14	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	12	2.56	16	0	1.000	6.0	5.63
15	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	3	0.60	18	2.19	37	3	.919	9.0	4.03
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	12	2.27	22	1	.955	5.5	4.25
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	10	2.17	24	1	.958	12.5	7.64
21	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	10	2.50	9	1.96	26	2	.923	5.0	4.01
26	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	13	2.41	22	0	1.000	8.5	5.58
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	15	2.26	27	1	.963	8.0	5.32
33	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	16	1.97	33	7	.788	10.5	3.29
36	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	4	0.80	8	2.08	24	0	1.000	14.5	4.66
41	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	12	2.27	22	1	.955	8.0	4.55
46	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	10	2.14	21	1	.952	13.0	7.27
Total		66	3	43	46	5	0.70	78	1.18	213	2.08	466	40	.914	159.5	4.45