Players

Ronnie Harrell Senior Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	16	17	15	7

Season 16 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
272 30th	.407 124th	15 146th	81 97th	70 36th

Career Honors

S172nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	13	.308	4	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.5	5.66
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.51
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	12	.333	5	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.72
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	4.92
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	2	28	.643	1	0	2	0.00	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	7.05
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	13	.385	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.33	2	.500	6.0	3.08
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	3	1	4	0.33	11	.636	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.35
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	10	-.200	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.49
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
14	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	18	.444	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.0	7.05
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	17	.118	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	2	.000	11.5	4.62
19	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	20	.500	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.09
22	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	18	.389	10	1	1	0.25	19	.947	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.91
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	3.77
25	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	22	.227	4	2	2	0.40	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	4.33
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	10	.600	3	1	2	0.25	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.16
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	6	23	.304	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.22
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	23	.348	4	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.93
35	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	10	35	.314	11	2	1	0.50	20	.950	.	.	.	.	24.0	8.77
38	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	5	26	.346	8	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.49
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	2	30	.600	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.98
43	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	7	32	.375	9	1	1	0.25	18	.944	.	.	.	.	22.0	9.32
44	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	22	.545	1	0	3	0.00	12	.750	2	0.40	2	1.000	17.5	6.20
48	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	3	37	.541	11	2	1	0.40	25	.960	.	.	.	.	28.5	8.75
Total		86	272	3.16	88	452	.407	108	15	46	0.17	293	.843	7	0.08	12	.583	323.0	6.06

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 16)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	6	1.88	17	3	.824	9.5	5.66
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	6	1.82	17	2	.882	4.5	3.51
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	2	0.50	10	2.04	23	2	.913	10.5	3.72
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	5	1.67	12	2.17	23	2	.913	10.5	4.92
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	2	0.60	2	0.40	23	2.22	46	3	.935	21.5	7.05
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.00	24	3	.875	6.0	3.08
10	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	11	1.84	25	4	.840	9.5	4.35
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	10	2.35	17	0	1.000	5.5	5.49
13	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	2.18	17	0	1.000	7.0	5.02
14	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	15	2.31	26	2	.923	13.0	7.05
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	3	0.75	21	2.30	37	3	.919	11.5	4.62
19	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	14	2.52	21	0	1.000	14.0	8.09
22	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	15	2.10	29	4	.862	13.0	5.91
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.05	22	4	.818	7.0	3.77
25	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	12	2.40	10	2.03	36	0	1.000	13.5	4.33
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	12	1.92	26	5	.808	9.5	3.16
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.19	21	3	.857	13.0	7.22
33	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	4	2.15	13	0	1.000	14.5	7.93
35	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	17	2.23	35	2	.943	24.0	8.77
38	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	11	2.28	18	2	.889	15.0	8.49
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	11	2.47	15	1	.933	22.5	8.98
43	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	22.0	9.32
44	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	17	2.24	34	3	.912	17.5	6.20
48	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	1	1.20	6	1.20	24	2.20	49	5	.898	28.5	8.75
Total		86	2	68	70	9	0.81	81	0.94	301	2.17	608	53	.913	323.0	6.06