Players

Hideo Nakahoma 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	13	14	13	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	6	18	-.056	4	1	5	0.20	16	.688	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.47
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	14	.357	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	4.26
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	19	.526	10	1	1	0.25	22	.955	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.17
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	9	.889	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.0	6.54
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	10	.400	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.67
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	18	.500	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.66
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	22	.591	3	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.24
17	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	4	32	.469	5	1	4	0.20	16	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	7.86
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	21	.143	7	1	2	0.25	18	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	6.30
21	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	7	33	.273	7	1	4	0.25	18	.778	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.80
25	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	28	.357	5	1	3	0.20	17	.824	0	0.00	2	.000	19.0	7.10
26	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	14	.214	11	0	2	0.00	20	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	4.71
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	29	.276	6	2	1	0.40	17	.941	1	0.20	2	.500	16.0	6.14
34	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	22	.500	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	15.0	7.85
35	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	28	.357	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.06
39	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	17	.588	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.37
40	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	16	-.063	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	4.5	3.21
44	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	15	.200	2	1	1	0.20	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.83
45	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	6	24	.292	6	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.00
Total		75	205	2.73	69	389	.350	97	18	38	0.24	273	.861	3	0.04	11	.273	255.5	6.17

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	12	2.40	20	0	1.000	9.0	4.47
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	11	2.00	24	3	.875	8.5	4.26
8	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	9	2.25	8	2.24	17	0	1.000	16.5	8.17
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	12	2.19	21	3	.857	11.0	6.54
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.19	16	0	1.000	7.0	3.67
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	8	1.82	22	2	.909	13.0	6.66
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	6	2.08	13	2	.846	16.5	8.24
17	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	11	2.20	12	2.16	25	2	.920	21.5	7.86
18	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	14	2.36	22	1	.955	12.5	6.30
21	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	13	2.29	21	1	.952	19.5	8.80
25	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	5	1.00	14	2.38	26	0	1.000	19.0	7.10
26	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	15	2.35	26	2	.923	8.0	4.71
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	16	2.55	22	1	.955	16.0	6.14
34	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	10	2.09	22	3	.864	15.0	7.85
35	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	6	1.50	12	2.35	23	1	.957	18.0	8.06
39	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	22	2.15	39	4	.897	15.0	6.37
40	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	15	2.13	31	3	.903	4.5	3.21
44	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	16	2.35	26	2	.923	10.0	3.83
45	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	23	1.98	47	8	.830	15.0	5.00
Total		75	1	63	64	5	0.85	89	1.19	245	2.20	463	38	.918	255.5	6.17