Players

Hideo Nakahoma 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	13	14	13	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	20	5.00	8	43	.279	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	8.25
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	24	.292	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	1	0.20	2	.500	13.0	4.45
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	12	.333	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.12
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	7	36	.167	3	1	3	0.25	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	5.59
7	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	24	.292	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	2	.000	12.0	5.78
8	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	28	.286	10	3	4	0.60	21	.810	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.23
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	24	.167	4	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.81
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.41
15	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	29	.379	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.17
21	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	29	.483	8	1	4	0.25	17	.765	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.90
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	18	.056	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.07
25	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	4	28	.571	6	2	2	0.40	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	23.0	6.89
26	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	17	.294	3	0	6	0.00	10	.400	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.82
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	20	.150	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.95
31	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	18	.222	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	4.01
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	4	30	.533	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.39
39	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	17	.235	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	5.44
41	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	21	.476	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	2	.000	13.0	7.55
Total		69	213	3.09	79	427	.314	84	10	50	0.14	225	.778	2	0.03	11	.182	242.5	5.55

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	12	2.03	30	1	.967	21.5	8.25
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	4	0.80	10	2.00	25	3	.880	13.0	4.45
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	12	2.18	28	1	.964	6.5	4.12
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	10	1.97	31	3	.903	14.5	5.59
7	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.90	29	4	.862	12.0	5.78
8	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	13	1.91	33	4	.879	17.5	5.23
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	8	2.00	9	1.66	32	6	.813	13.0	4.81
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	9	2.00	20	2	.900	7.5	3.41
15	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	3	0.50	7	1.75	12	2.00	26	4	.846	16.0	7.17
21	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	11	1.81	27	4	.852	21.0	6.90
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	16	2.22	27	3	.889	6.0	4.07
25	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	9	2.00	31	0	1.000	23.0	6.89
26	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.83	23	3	.870	9.0	4.82
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	14	2.07	28	2	.929	6.0	2.95
31	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	17	1.97	39	3	.923	10.5	4.01
34	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	23	2.48	33	2	.939	22.0	8.39
39	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	8	1.86	21	3	.857	10.5	5.44
41	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	21	2.50	30	1	.967	13.0	7.55
Total		69	2	35	37	7	0.54	70	1.01	224	2.03	513	49	.904	242.5	5.55