Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	1	0.75	17	.941	4	1.00	6	.667	3.0	6.31
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	4	1.00	10	.400	0.0	5.65
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	3	1.00	7	.429	1.0	3.85
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	4.95
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	3.50
45	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	.571	0.0	5.96
Total		22	.	.	.	.	.	15	4	4	0.18	42	.905	24	1.09	49	.490	4.0	5.04

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	16	2.16	32	1	.969	3.0	6.31
18	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	2.23	13	2	.846	0.0	5.65
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	1.77	22	2	.909	1.0	3.85
35	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.38	16	1	.938	0.0	4.95
40	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.27	15	0	1.000	0.0	3.50
45	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	15	2.48	23	0	1.000	0.0	5.96
Total		22	.	.	.	.	.	29	1.32	62	2.20	121	6	.950	4.0	5.04