Players

Cal Trimper 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	16	14	16	16	10

Career Honors

S162nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	14	.500	13	0	2	0.00	19	.895	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	6.75
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	19	.368	6	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.51
5	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	8	.750	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.04
6	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	8	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
7	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	19	.316	2	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.95
9	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	24	.375	2	2	3	0.50	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	5.97
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	2	25	.760	3	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.86
12	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	8	28	.214	3	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.89
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.31
16	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	12	.667	8	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.93
19	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	2	19	.684	4	0	5	0.00	17	.706	1	0.20	1	1.000	16.5	6.94
20	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	1	0	4	0.00	10	.600	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.17
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	25	.480	1	0	5	0.00	13	.615	0	0.00	1	.000	17.0	6.74
23	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	20	.300	4	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	11.5	5.83
25	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	15	.667	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.52
27	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	17	.647	12	1	3	0.33	21	.857	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.93
30	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	25	.360	7	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.15
32	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	7	27	.370	6	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.08
Total		66	218	3.30	49	336	.503	95	8	43	0.12	260	.835	2	0.03	5	.400	250.0	6.78

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	4	1.33	6	1.92	12	2	.833	10.5	6.75
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	5	2.07	14	0	1.000	13.0	7.51
5	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	4	1.67	15	2	.867	8.5	4.04
6	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	6	2.17	12	1	.917	10.0	7.40
7	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	21	2.36	33	3	.909	12.5	5.95
9	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	18	2.11	36	5	.861	15.5	5.97
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	12	2.12	26	2	.923	22.5	7.86
12	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	13	2.22	23	2	.913	16.0	5.89
14	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	6	2.23	13	0	1.000	13.0	8.31
16	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.59	17	0	1.000	9.0	6.93
19	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	26	2.56	36	0	1.000	16.5	6.94
20	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	.	.	11	2.15	27	1	.963	12.5	6.17
22	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	15	2.14	36	3	.917	17.0	6.74
23	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	17	2.44	25	1	.960	11.5	5.83
25	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.09	22	1	.955	14.0	7.52
27	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	9	2.10	20	0	1.000	15.0	8.93
30	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	19	2.05	40	6	.850	14.0	6.15
32	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	24	2.39	38	3	.921	19.0	7.08
Total		66	2	44	46	4	0.70	73	1.11	233	2.21	445	32	.928	250.0	6.78