Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	4	0.75	18	.778	4	1.00	4	1.000	3.0	8.48
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	17	3	5	0.60	28	.821	3	0.60	11	.273	3.0	4.91
5	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	7	.571	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	4.38
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.67	12	.917	3	1.00	4	.750	2.0	4.53
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	1	3	0.25	21	.857	5	1.25	5	1.000	1.0	5.04
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	0	2	0.00	19	.895	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	5.16
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	8	.000	0.0	6.20
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	14	.786	5	1.00	11	.455	0.0	4.70
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	1	0.33	1	1.000	2.0	5.23
21	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	4	0.20	19	.789	7	1.40	7	1.000	1.0	7.88
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	6	2.00	10	.600	1.0	6.57
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.75
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	2	0.40	19	.895	5	1.00	10	.500	2.0	4.40
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	18	.889	1	0.20	6	.167	0.0	6.38
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	6.86
Total		57	.	.	.	.	.	108	16	34	0.28	235	.855	54	0.95	101	.535	16.0	5.56

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	9	2.10	21	1	.952	3.0	8.48
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	9	1.69	32	2	.938	3.0	4.91
5	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	4	1.57	21	2	.905	0.0	4.38
8	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.20	15	1	.933	2.0	4.53
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	5	1.69	26	3	.885	1.0	5.04
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	1.80	15	2	.867	0.0	5.16
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	4	1.73	15	1	.933	0.0	6.20
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	7	1.73	22	5	.773	0.0	4.70
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	1.95	22	2	.909	2.0	5.23
21	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	11	2.09	22	2	.909	1.0	7.88
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	1.90	31	3	.903	1.0	6.57
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	1.90	20	1	.950	0.0	2.75
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	10	1.69	35	6	.829	2.0	4.40
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	18	2.10	39	2	.949	0.0	6.38
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.43	21	0	1.000	1.0	6.86
Total		57	.	.	.	.	.	132	2.32	127	1.90	357	33	.908	16.0	5.56