Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	16	.125	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.06
9	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	8	23	-.130	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.21
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	14	.071	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.58
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	0	11	.545	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.00
18	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	10	.200	8	2	3	0.50	17	.824	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.03
21	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	28	.286	8	3	4	0.75	16	.750	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.91
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	14	.071	2	2	2	0.67	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.28
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	9	.111	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.58
35	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	19	-.105	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.46
40	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	9	.111	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.63
Total		36	43	1.19	26	153	.111	37	9	23	0.25	116	.802	.	.	.	.	63.5	5.07

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.06
9	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.21
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.58
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.00
18	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.03
21	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.91
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.28
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.58
35	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.46
40	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.63
Total		36	2	19	21	2	0.58	41	1.14	.	.	.	.	.	63.5	5.07